KYLE LAFFERTY reckons Michael Beale would be the ideal candidate to take over from Steven Gerrard - if he ever decided to leave Ibrox.
Northern Irishman Lafferty worked under the pair during his second stint with Gers and he was impressed with the former Liverpool coach and his training techniques.
Speaking on Open Goal, he said: "The longer I was there I started to realise, Michael Beale, I think he's the man behind it.
"No disrespect to Steven Gerrard who I think is an amazing manager, where he has taken the club from day one to now is night and day - he's made Rangers a force again in the the Premiership and Europe.
"But Michael Beale is behind the scenes and I think he's the brains behind it. Tactically he's amazing.
"I think if Gerrard went to Liverpool and Michael Beale stayed there wouldn't be a change.
"I think Michael Beale is into everything, detail and he could step up to be manager because he's that good."
Lafferty also discussed how nerves got the better of him during his second stint at Ibrox.
He added:
"I felt nervous as anything at Rangers the second time.
"I don't know if it was because I was playing under Steven Gerrard or what.
"I spoke to him to get some answers why I wasn't playing and I said 'I actually feel like I'm here on trial'.
"He said 'That must be good because you are out to make an impression on me'.
"I said: 'I don't know because I feel nervous, you're making me feel nervous'.
"It was weird. I had a feeling. He keeps himself away from everyone and doesn't really talk to many of the players and I had a feeling that he regretted signing me after a couple of weeks.
"Against Motherwell on my debut I scored twice and then scored against Villarreal so I was thinking 'surely I'm doing alright'.
"Maybe I overthought things.
"Against St Johnstone we were a goal down and I came on and changed the game, we won 2-1 and I played well.
"He came up to me in the dressing room and said 'If you play like that every time you get a chance then that's what we want and why we signed you'.
"It made me feel good but it was strange.
"It was the first time I couldn't have a bit of banter or joke with the manager and he made me feel wanted. It could have made me feel insecure."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel