Conor McCarthy, the St Mirren defender, has insisted that there is no time for the Paisley side to feel sorry for themselves as they prepare to fight their way up the table.
Jim Goodwin was irked at the manner of the club’s midweek defeat to Livingston with the concession of two sloppy goals proving to be too much of an ask to overturn, despite a late rally in the game.
Saints host a Motherwell side who had to deal with a disappointing result of their own on Wednesday night and McCarthy is well aware of the necessity of taking something from the game.
“We showed character to come back into the game and it is vital that we bring that into the game at the weekend against Motherwell,” said the Irishman. “There is no time for doom and gloom. We have to pick ourselves up and get ready for Saturday.”
The result gave Livingston their sixth successive home win but McCarthy, who arrived at the club in the January transfer window, admitted that the physicality in the game lived up to the West Lothian side’s reputation.
“They are very good at the dirty side of the game,” he said. “I was told coming into the game that they are a nasty team to play against and they proved that on Wednesday night. They are good at that side of it but on reflection I still think a point could have been a fair result.”
Meanwhile, Livingston striker Lyndon Dykes denied that he was streetwise in the way he won the first-half penalty that so irked the St Mirren players. McCarthy insisted that it was a harsh call but the Australian striker was inevitably having none of it.
“I’m not sure if it was a penalty,” he said. “It happened that quickly, I felt contact and went down. When I went down I was still trying to header it as I didn’t know if the referee had called it or not and give the penalty.
“When teams come to play against us we make it tough. We are in for the battle, we want to play good football when we can and we are good at it. “It’s starting to get tight around where we are on the table and we have an aim now as personally we should be pushing for top six.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here