Golf's governing bodies intend to break the "ever-increasing cycle of hitting distances", but admit it could take years before solutions are found.
Advances in fitness and golf equipment technology have seen players hit the ball further and further in recent years, leading to golf courses being lengthened in an effort to continue to test the world's best.
In a Joint Statement of Principles issued in 2002, the R&A and USGA stated that if "meaningful increases in distance arrive, (we) would feel it immediately necessary to seek ways of protecting the game", but it took until 2018 for an admission that their "line in the sand" had been crossed.
That prompted the launch of a two-year Distance Insights Report (DIR) which was published on Tuesday and concedes that "an increasing number of courses... are at risk of becoming less challenging or ultimately obsolete".
However, a further nine to 12 months of consultation will now take place before any potential rule changes are proposed, after which equipment manufacturers will be given the chance to have their input.
"It will be a multi-year process," USGA executive director Mike Davis admitted.
The USGA and R&A will assess the potential of a "local rule" which would allow tournament committees to "specify use of clubs and/or balls intended to result in shorter hitting distances".
That raises the prospect of limited-distance equipment being a requirement for entry into certain tournaments, although Augusta National chairman Fred Ridley said last year "it's very unlikely that we would ever produce a Masters ball".
Asked on Tuesday about such a prospect, R&A chief executive Martin Slumbers told the PA news agency:
"No, it's not what we have in mind; I wouldn't draw that conclusion.
"We are certainly not putting solutions on the table at this point on that.
"In the next 45 days we will issue research topics that we want to work with the industry on, but the local rule is more about creating options for the game as we go forward."
Slumbers added: "I think this is a pivotal moment for the game. We have come at this from a point of view of trying to find a solution to what is a very difficult problem.
"Just over two years ago we agreed with our colleagues in America we would do a very detailed piece of research into the overall impact of distance and that's what we are publishing today.
"The conclusion is that this is the time now that we need to bring the ever-increasing cycle of hitting distance to an end and start the debate on solutions."
The USGA and R&A have pledged to review their current specifications for conforming equipment to see if they require "tightening or adjusting", but such potential changes would be aimed at top-level professionals and amateurs, rather than recreational players.
Questioned as to why it has taken so long to get to this point, Slumbers said: "The 'line in the sand' comment led to the detailed work that we've done.
"It is a difficult problem and there is a process that we need go through to have this debate. We have to do this in the right way.
"It's very important that we bring the industry with us for the game to ensure it's thriving 50 years from now. This difficult problem will only reach its solution stage if we all work together.
"It will take time but I am actually very pleased that we've got serious people thinking about this serious problem in a collegiate way. If it takes a bit of time, it takes a bit of time."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here