RANGERS today revealed they are astounded after being hit with four disciplinary charges by the SFA and vowed to defend themselves "in the most robust manner".
Ibrox first-team coaches Tom Culshaw and Michael Beale were last night cited after being involved in touchline bust-ups in the Ladbrokes Premiership games against Hibernian and Celtic last year respectively.
And the Govan club have also been accused of breaching Rule 204 and failing to "conduct themselves in an orderly fashion" in those matches at Easter Road and Parkhead.
John Potter, the Hibs assistant manager, has been cited by SFA compliance officer Clare Whyte for alleged misconduct in the game at Easter Road last month.
READ MORE: Rangers 2-0 Stranraer: Five talking points from Scottish Cup tie
A principal hearing date of Thursday, February 6, has been set for all of the cases to be heard at Hampden.
Steven Gerrard admitted he was surprised at how long it had taken the governing body to act following his side's 2-0 win over Stranraer in the William Hill Scottish Cup last night.
And Rangers have today accused the SFA of holding them to a "different and more stringent code of conduct" to other Scottish clubs.
A statement read: "Rangers is astounded by the notices of complaint issued by the SFA.
"It is concerning that it seems the governing body is seeking to hold Rangers to a different and more stringent code of conduct than that applied to others, with unprecedented charges being levied against the club.
"Rangers fans can be assured that it is our firm intention to resist the charges in the most robust manner possible. Rangers will make further comment after the weekend."
Gerrard said: “I was a bit surprised by the timing of it, how long it has taken. But that’s the way it is.
“It’s not relief [that Alfredo Morelos and Ryan Kent haven't been cited individually], no. We have read what’s come our way today, the club will deal with it and we’ll get on with it. That’s the way it is.
Asked about the length of time the SFA had taken to act, Gerrard said: "That’s the way it is. We can’t control that. So we’ll turn up where we have to turn up, listen to what we have to listen to and deal with whatever comes our way."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here