STEVEN Gerrard acknowledged last night that Alfredo Morelos’ first dismissal of a previously-blemish free season against Motherwell was a blow - but insisted referee Don Roberson had been “desperate” to send someone off during Rangers’ 2-0 win at Fir Park.
Whilst the Rangers manager had “no complaints” about the match official’s decision to dismiss the 23-year-old for two bookings – the first was for catching Jake Carroll then the second was for gesturing to the home fans after he scored his 27th of the season – he said he wished referees would take the abuse players receive from the stands into account.
While Morelos was showered with missiles such as cups of Bovril, coins and a lighter after the gesture, the Englishman felt the card was coming and had been trying to substitute his striker beforehand. He confirmed that Morelos would be fined in addition to being forced to sit out Friday night’s Premiership meeting with Hibs at Easter Road on Friday.
“It is a setback today, he knows that, we know that,” said Gerrard. “But let’s not forget how much of an improvement there has been. We will reset him and I’m sure he will be fine because he hates missing football matches. I’m sure he hates getting punished in the pocket so hopefully he will get back on the horse and continue to improve in that area. Unfortunately, the supporters and his team-mates will suffer because he’s not available for the next game.
“I think officials need to take [abuse from the stands] into consideration at times,” he added. “There had been a bit of a commotion between both sets of players, although there wasn’t much in it. However, when I saw the referee book Ryan Jack and Declan Gallagher I thought he was waiting for a moment. We have no complaints ... but I felt he was desperate to give out a red card today. I had that feeling, which is unfortunate as our player does get that type of abuse. We tried to take him off ... because he was already on a yellow but also because we were flashing balls across the six-yard box and I felt someone with a bit of nous and experience would get a tap-in.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here