There’s a book that comes highly recommended called ‘Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump’, in which the current US President’s dodgy duplicity on the fairways, greens and in the rough is documented in all its unedifying glory.
If it’s not the use of a foot wedge here then it’s the brazen absurdity of a gimme chip there. Perhaps the author could hastily cobble together an addendum with a chapter on Patrick Reed?
The former Masters champion, who is in Australia this week as part of Team USA in the Presidents Cup match with the Internationals, caused a right old rumpus at the weekend as his highly dubious antics – or act of cheating as many have called it – in the Hero World Challenge thrust him back into a spotlight of controversy.
Then again, his actions may get him the Presidential Medal of Freedom from madcap Trump.
Amid the mounting criticism of Reed’s rules violation – footage showed him twice brushing away sand behind his ball with two practise swings – Australian tour pro Cameron Smith, who is in Ernie Els’ International side for this week’s tussle, didn’t hold back.
He suggested that Reed’s limp explanation of the incident was “bulls**t” while adding that he “didn’t have any sympathy for anyone that cheats”.
If Smith and Reed go head-to-head at any point at Royal Melbourne, the matchplay bout will have to take place inside a canvas ring given all this verbal sparring.
READ MORE: Reed's intentions were far from honourable
Reed, who remains typically defiant, clearly doesn’t give a Castlemaine Four X what anybody thinks about him but the 29-year-old insists he is not a cheat.
In the merry midst of the panto season, the cry “oh yes he is” is not just reserved for the Pavilion Theatre.
“It’s not the right word to use,” Reed said of the ‘c’ word as he attempted another defence of his activities. “At the end of the day, if you do something unintentionally that breaks the rules, it’s not considered cheating and at the end of the day that’s what it is.
“If you’re intentionally trying to do something, that would be considered cheating, but I wasn’t intentionally trying to improve a lie or anything like that, because if it was, it would have been a really good lie and I would have hit it really close.”
Not many people are buying Reed’s lame excuses – well, apart from President Trump perhaps - and the reaction of the galleries to the American when the competition heats up could be interesting.
Reed has always been something of a rabble-rousing character in the team arena and, having been on the receiving end of some withering observations from other players, he is clearly relishing being the villain of the piece.
READ MORE: McIlroy takes moral stance on Saudi Arabia event
“It goes from wanting to beat those guys to it now turning personal, so it’s going to be a fun week,” he added.
“They (the International team members) are going to speak out, because they want to get their crowds going and get on their side. That’s the name of the game.
“At the end of the day, all I can do is control what I can do and how I play, and so it doesn’t matter who I’m playing on the other team.
“My job this week as the captain has told all of our guys is to go out and win your point.”
Reed was given the tag Captain America for his Ryder Cup heroics. At the moment, though, he’s more like that Commander in Cheat.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here