THEy may have been playing a weakened Munster side, but it was still a significant victory at Musgrave Park for Edinburgh as Richard Cockerill’s side closed the gap at the top of Conference B to two points.
However, the head coach refused to get carried away and called for a more clinical edge.
Tries in each half from Matt Scott and Eroni Sau gave Edinburgh the 18-16 win, but Cockerill’s side struggled badly each side of half time as their 10-0 lead was transformed into a 16-10 deficit before the hour mark. However, they deserved the win and after a Simon Hickey penalty steadied their challenge, Sau’s late try gave them the four points.
Cockerill was not inclined to celebrate though.
“Munster is a great club with great people,” he said. “I’ve got a huge amount of respect for them and I’m very keen to make the point around the circumstance of this [that Munster were saving players for the Champions Cup games]. I have been at Leicester plenty of times when you put a second team out and a team come and turn you over and they’ve run round like they’ve run the World Cup and you go ‘Really is that your aspirations?’
“Well our aspirations are bigger than – with respect – beating Munster’s second team. We need to be better.
“There are parts of our game that were really really good tonight. This is a great win for us, it’s a great four points but circumstance has fallen our way, we all know the reasons why but we’ll take it. But there are parts of our game tonight that just weren’t good enough with the players that we had on the field.
Last week, Edinburgh coughed up a lead to end up drawing with Bordeaux in the Challenge Cup and after this victory in the PRO14 they face the first of their back-to-back games with Wasps at BT Murrayfield on Friday.
They might have to play for that game without the services of centre and try scorer Scott, who sustained a rib injury, but other than his knock Edinburgh appear to have emerged unscathed.
“He popped his rib cartilage. If you’re a prop you get on with it but if you’re a centre it’s a couple of weeks out, isn’t it,” joked Cockerill.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here