SCOTT McKenna believes that playing for Scotland this week will be the perfect way to prove to potential January suitors that he can cut it a higher level. The 23-year-old Aberdeen central defender – subject to a failed deadline day bid in the region of £6.5m from Aston Villa, after other rejected offers from Celtic, Queen’s Park Rangers and Nottingham Forest – handed in a transfer request this summer only to knuckle down at Aberdeen, where he is under contract until 2023. While his club manager Derek McInnes insists it was up to a club “to come up with the right money to take him away”, McKenna is keen to put himself in the shop window this week.
“International football is a step up from the SPFL,” said McKenna. “Teams will look at that and see if I can handle it. That’s always what I’m trying to prove to them. I just need to keep my head down and see what happens come January.
“The summer was probably the worst for me,” he added. “There was maybe a bit of expectancy for it to happen. When you have been working for the full year, building up to that point that you thought was going to be THE time, there was that wee bit of disappointment. But it can’t linger for too long. The window closed. We were in Croatia and we had a game an hour or two later. There was no time for me to dwell on things. As frustrating as it can be, there is absolutely nothing I can do about it, apart from trying to play well.”
McKenna, meanwhile, said he was surprised there hadn’t been more interest in his young club-mate Lewis Ferguson – the 20-year-old who has been linked recently with Rangers. The club graced by his dad Derek and uncle Barry, Ferguson himself – under contract until 2024 - was also once in the Ibrox youth ranks.
“I’m actually surprised there has not been more interest,” said McKenna. “With his family background at Rangers, it is probably something you would expect. But I’m sure Aberdeen will be desperate to try and hold on to him. It’s something he will need to get used to, having his name in the paper and being linked with other clubs. It’s incredible the amount of pressure that he’s put under, but he takes everything in his stride.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here