RYAN CHRISTIE believes that the red-hot atmosphere inside Roazhon Park swayed referee Jose Maria Sanchez into denying him a penalty and sending off teammate Vakoun Issouf Bayo in the draw against Stade Rennais.
Christie couldn’t believe he wasn’t awarded a spot-kick when he was tripped by opponent Joris Gnagnon in the second half, although the Spanish referee did award the visitors a penalty for a trip on James Forrest soon afterwards.
Christie believes that the inconsistency shown by the official was caused by the baying Rennes crowd as well the antics of the home players.
“I think it was definitely a penalty,” Christie said. “At the time I looked back and I expected to see the referee giving it. I was shocked when he didn’t.
“I saw it again in the changing-room after the game and it’s a definite penalty. It was a relief when we got James’ one to even it up. It was maybe what it was going to take to break the deadlock for us and it was a relief to come away with a point.
“It was a strange one. If it’s not a penalty, then he had to book me, but he awarded a throw in.
“It didn’t make much sense. I was even questioning myself but when I saw it again in the dressing room it was a definite penalty.
“There was a sense of frustration. I don’t envy the referee’s job, especially in that atmosphere where the fans are shouting for every decision.
“The likes of Jonny Hayes’s tackle, there was nothing wrong with it, Broony got booked for a strong challenge in the first half.
“It felt like we were treading on eggshells going in to the last 10 minutes because any tackle he was going to reach for the red card.”
Christie felt that Celtic perhaps should have come away with the three points regardless of the referee’s decisions, with some poor decision-making in the final third proving the difference between a very decent draw and what would have been an outstanding victory.
“We had a lot to deal with out there,” he said. “It was a frustration at half time being behind as it wasn’t like we’d been dominated or cut open.
“We were dealing with them, but we were maybe not getting the final pass away. We still felt confident going in to the second half.
“It was nice to get the penalty after what happened and we showed a lot of character.
“The new boys like Chris Julien, Hatem (Elhamed) and Boli (Bolingoli) did really well.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here