MARK Wotte is back working in a club job after eight years in
development roles at the national associations of first Scotland and then Morocco. From July 1, it has been his job to oversee the ambitious youth policy at Al Wahda, of Abu Dhabi, a designation where no expense is spared across no fewer than 10 age-group teams.
But if his globe-trotting work providing the structures to help bring talented young footballers through the ranks has taught him anything, it is this: youth development is far too important just to be left to the clubs. Perhaps the case par excellence is that of Falkirk, who took the strategic decision to dispense with their youth academy on cost grounds, even though they had the good fortune to have their very own SFA performance school in their back yard at Graham High School.
“You can’t just leave youth development up to the clubs,” explains Wotte, “because a lot of them don’t have the finance, and a lot of them probably prioritise the funds to the first team.
“I’ve come across some clubs in Scotland who said they were very proud of their youth development systems, but if I ask them how much of your own money did you spend, ie. above the SFA payment, they start muttering and say not too much because we don’t have the money.
“I think the performance schools have proven their value. Every club has players who have been part of the performance school strategy at one point in time, whether they are in small clubs or big clubs. I think everyone has seen the benefit of it.”
So why are they back in the firing line, then? Well, while it obviously doesn’t help when the national team lose the matches they have recently, it is also true that the likes of Celtic and Rangers have the financial wherewithal to run their own school schemes at St Ninian’s in Kirkintilloch and Boclair Academy in Milngavie. It leaves the rest of the country rather sporadically catered for, with some year groups down to a handful of children.
“If the base is strong, the top of the pyramid will be high,” said Wotte. “But the national team coach loses three games, and everybody is talking bad about everything in Scottish football again. That is the mindset of Scottish football, they pick on anything out of the ordinary. I don’t see any relationship between the bad results of the national team and the performance schools. Those boys who started in 2011 are now 19 and you can’t expect a 19-year-old to play for the national team, they must play two or three years at first-team level first.
“And that is another huge responsibility for Scottish football, that the first-team managers take more responsibility for the talent management of the payer. It has been done by just a few clubs, Hearts did well a few seasons back but unfortunately are suffering in their first team at the moment.
“Celtic or Rangers have the money to fund schools for themselves, so I guess the SFA schools are for the clubs who don’t have the means to run them by themselves. They are money well spent in my opinion for the sake of Scottish football. In my opinion we should continue with the programme and put more energy into the pathway of getting them into first teams. This is something done
fantastically well done by Portugal, Belgium and Holland but is still a weak spot in the pathway when it comes to Scotland.”
As someone who counts Feyenoord as one of his former clubs, Wotte will be interested to see how they fare against Rangers tomorrow night. He sees the two teams as evenly matched and pinpointed winger Steven Berghuis as the biggest threat. “They have been struggling a bit,” he said. “To play in Rotterdam is always very difficult but so is Ibrox so I think the two teams will be quite equal and it will be very interesting to see who comes out on top. Berghuis is the best player, he is always coming in on from the right onto his left foot. There was a lot of interest from PSV Eindhoven and foreign clubs in him but he signed a new contract.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here