YOU’VE probably heard the famous saying about opinions, and how everyone has got one, so I won’t sully these pages by relaying it here. But never is the phrase more fitting than when it all hits the fan for one of our clubs on the European stage, as it did for Celtic during the week. Blame scatterguns over anyone remotely responsible for the result like, well, that’s probably also best left to the imagination.
Whether it is Neil Lennon and his tactics, the investment in disco lights rather than a remotely competent full-back, the lack of a discernible recruitment plan from the board or the underperformance of Hoopy the Huddlehound, everyone connected with the club is shoulder-deep as the recriminations fly. It is only natural then that even innocent bystanders are caught in the crossfire.
Eventually, fingers start pointing outwards, and even in a footballing nation where recycling tired old arguments is something of a national pastime, one of the tritest old standards still inspires the sort of head-shaking disbelief normally reserved for when the latest name of the Challenge Cup is unveiled.
If anything positive for Scottish football is to come from what was a hugely negative night for Celtic, and by extension our reputation on the continent, let it be this, if only this. That the argument smaller clubs in Scotland are to blame when the bigger clubs crash out of Europe can finally be laid to rest.
Leaving aside the fact that football is hardly a form of socialism, and that the hoarding of prize money and television revenue is at least partly responsible for the chasm that exists between Celtic, Rangers, and their domestic competitors, the level of team that has eliminated Celtic from the Champions League in recent years hardly reads like a who’s who of European giants.
The likes of Legia Warsaw, Maribor, Malmo, AEK Athens and then Cluj this season may provide a stiffer challenge than Celtic faced over the opening games of the Premiership against St Johnstone and Motherwell, but are they really a huge step up from Rangers, Aberdeen, Hearts or Hibs? Their finances would suggest not.
The entire wage bill of the Romanian league is around £53m, £6m short of the wage bill posted by Celtic alone last season. Cluj are a side packed with free transfers, with their only outlay this summer being the £360,000 signing of Yacouba Sylla – who didn’t even start on Tuesday night – from Stromsgodset, and the £180,000 capture of centre-half Andrei Burca from FC Botosani. Celtic, by contrast, had £10m worth of defenders sitting on the bench, either not fit enough or not trusted enough to play in a game of such magnitude.
That Celtic weren’t fully prepared to take on such modest opposition in European terms isn’t the fault of St Johnstone or Motherwell’s ropey defending.That argument might have washed in years gone by when coming up against the cream of the continent, bridging a yawning chasm in terms of quality to the likes of Barcelona or PSG. But Celtic should be able to raise their game to overcome Cluj, who may not quite be a Poundland outfit, but are certainly no more than a fairly solid TK Maxx.
To be fair to Neil Lennon, unlike his predecessors like Martin O’Neill, he has accepted the blame lies if not squarely on his own shoulders, then at least on Celtic as a collective for the Cluj debacle. Addressing the club’s own failings in preparation, recruitment, and ultimately tactics is a far more productive use of this reflection period as Celtic seek to avoid elimination from all European football this season.
Apportioning blame to others for their failings, as well as keeping their noses slightly in front of their domestic opponents as their benchmark, has hardly served them well thus far. But then, that’s only an opinion.
AND ANOTHER THING...
SOME months back I had a chat with Rob Wicks, the Commercial Director of Aberdeen, who believed with no little relief that the age of omnipresent gambling advertising throughout football would soon be coming to an end.
The catalyst for this conclusion was an announcement from GVC, the company who operate Ladbrokes, that they would be re-focusing their advertising towards responsible gambling, and sure enough, yesterday they announced they would not be renewing their title sponsorship of the SPFL at all once the current deal runs out at the end of this season.
Aberdeen are one of the few clubs in Scotland to refuse any sponsorship from gambling firms on the laudable grounds of social responsibility, and GVC deserve some credit for recognising their own responsibility in this regard too, but it would be a brave person who would bet against another bookmaker filling the void.
Around the same time as I spoked to Wicks, I also spoke to a prominent lawyer who has been involved in the gambling industry and in football, who tempered that optimism with a heavy dose of reality. That there is a reason why all of the main competitions in Scotland, as well as the EFL in England, are sponsored by gambling firms; no one else is interested.
Unfortunately, with the level of footballer's wages and the lack of viable alternatives, accepting the bookie's lucre seems the only way to stop the house of cards collapsing.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here