If there is one thing that sticks in Paul Lawrie’s craw then it is slow play. As an outspoken critic of the game’s snail-like campaigners, the Aberdonian is not afraid to make his feelings known.
It was no surprise then that the ponderous palavers that Bryson DeChambeau embarked on during last weekend’s Northern Trust Open just about had Lawrie cracking the cat o’ nine tails in an exasperated fankle.
DeChambeau came in for stinging criticism from leading players, pundits and the public and while he initially defended his actions with a long-winded, condescending lecture to the media, the Ryder Cup player has since admitted he will work on improving his pace of play.
Lawrie, who is competing in this weekend’s Scottish Senior Open at Craigielaw, described DeChambeau’s self-defence as a “rambling mess” and lamented the fact that PGA Tour officials failed to take a strong stance.
READ MORE: Nick Rodger on golf's slow play issue
“What I don’t get is that they have a video of him [DeChambeau] taking two minutes 20 seconds to hit an eight-foot putt and taking three minutes to hit a 70-yard chip so why can’t they act on that?,” said Lawrie. “The players are up in arms about it. Players understand it’s hard for officials to catch players. They are clever. When they go on the clock they speed up.
“[Bernhard] Langer has done it for as long as we can remember. You can’t catch him. But Bryson was caught red-handed on video so do something about it.
“Bryson could have just held his hands up, said sorry, say I’ve been caught and that he’ll do something about it. It’s the easiest answer he could give. But oh no, he goes the other route and blames other people.
“If they [tour officials] don’t take action now then they never will. That was a big backlash. I’ve never seen anything like that before.
“At least they [the PGA Tour] have said they will review their [slow play] policy but I’d be surprised if that happens. The only way you will stop it is with a referee with every game.
“On our tour [in Europe] I can’t imagine they could afford that. The PGA Tour possibly could. I’m not saying there’s an easy fix but they had an unbelievable opportunity there to give someone a two-shot penalty but they let him go.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here