JAMIE Murray was too polite to say it so his mixed doubles partner Bethanie Mattek Sands had a pop at the All England Club schedulers on his behalf. Requiring to be called back mid-match for the second time this Wimbledon as his match couldn’t be finished, he was on court for a grand total of seven minutes yesterday, just long enough to mis-time a few early volleys and watch his US partner serve a few double faults before his tournament was over, courtesy of this 4-6, 6-3, 3-6 defeat to No 3 seeds Mate Pavic of Croatia and Gabriela Dabrowski of Canada.
It was an infuriating end to things for the 33-year-old Scot, not least because the match could and should have been played to a conclusion on Monday. Originally scheduled for not before 5.30pm on Court No 12, they saw the promise of a slot on Centre Court – where you can play on under the lights till 11pm – withdrawn before being forced to go on in what was already bad light at 6.59pm on Court No 18. With Roger Federer making light work of Italy’s Matteo Berretini, the score stood at 1-1 when Federer claimed his victory on Centre Court just ten minutes later.
“They initially said if the match went fast on Centre we would go on there, but Roger won in one hour 14 minutes,” said Mattek-Sands. “I don’t know what is faster than that …. a withdrawal?? Yeah, so just don’t offer it. That was why we were waiting, otherwise we would have gone on Court No 18 and played the match in full.”
All England Club member or not, the truth is that there probably isn’t another person at this championships this fortnight who finds himself moved around the schedule more than the Scot, whose matches are always guaranteed to pull early evening crowds.
“A bit yeah, of course that’s often why I put late on in the schedule and then maybe you get moved. For me personally I’m waiting around all day to play. They say TBA and not before 5.30 but that can be 7.30 or whatever. Me personally I’d rather play first, second, third match and know that I’m going to get on, know where I’m going to be playing. I understand why this happens but from my point of view and my preparations it’s not ideal.
“I don’t think it’s something they needed to apologise for but I think they just could have been a bit more proactive about the whole thing because we could have gone on 45mins before we did and we would have finished the match,” said the 33-year-old. “
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here