STEVE Clarke last night praised the Kilmarnock board’s decision to reduce the number of tickets handed to Celtic and Rangers supporters for games at Rugby Park.
Billy Bowie, the Kilmarnock owner, has revealed that followers of the Parkhead and Ibrox clubs will only get 4,000 briefs, around half of what they previously received, in the future.
The Ayrshire businessman has taken the decision following a controversial Ladbrokes Premiership game against the Scottish champions back in February.
Kris Boyd, the Kilmarnock striker, was struck by a coin as he warmed up at the side of the park in the first-half and Celtic fans spilled onto the pitch after Scott Brown scored a late winner.
Bowie revealed that Kilmarnock fans had felt intimidated during matches against the Old Firm clubs and stated he wanted to create a more family friendly environment even if it meant losing out financially.
He is also keen to create a party atmosphere in Kilmarnock’s final Premiership game against Rangers on Sunday, May 19 – when the oldest top flight club will celebrate their 150th anniversary.
Rangers, who will only be offered tickets for the Chadwick Stand, responded by revealing they will consider whether to take a full allocation of tickets for games at Rugby Park in future.
However, Clarke, whose side are bidding to secure a place in Europe for the first time in 17 years, believes Bowie and his fellow directors should be applauded for the move.
"It's not about Rangers,” he said. “It's about Kilmarnock. It's a decision to suit our football club and our fans, that's the important thing. It has got nothing to do with Rangers. I am not surprised by their response. The nonsense that has followed is typical Scotland I suppose.
“That is a fantastic commitment from the Kilmarnock board of directors to do that. It must be really difficult for them. It is a club that lives on a really tight budget.
“For those people to stand up and say ‘no, no, the Rugby Park experience should be for Kilmarnock fans not the opposition fans’ is a big statement to make. I am really pleased they have done it. It is a big statement to make.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here