SCOTLAND'S under-fire referees were back in the spotlight yesterday as Partick Thistle manager Gary Caldwell claimed bungling officials are putting livelihoods at stake following his side's 1-1 draw with Falkirk.
Caldwell was incensed as Andrew Dallas sent off Thistle midfielder Gary Harkins for two bookable offences at Firhill, feeling that the second of those - a foul on Ross MacLean - didn't merit a yellow card.
The Thistle boss went on to label match officials arrogant, although he declined to elaborate on the post-match discussion he had with Dallas as they left the field of play.
“Every week there is bad decisions in every game we play in," Caldwell said. “It’s important for people’s lives that they get these decisions right.
“I’m not saying they can be perfect. I think the way they go about it after, the arrogance they show I think isn’t great.
“I think it needs to improve. We need to make it better because this is people’s livelihoods at stake in these games.
“I don’t understand how every foul we make is a yellow card, yet they get away with one, two, three fouls. I think he got sucked in today.
“I had a quiet word with the referee after the game, but I can’t say what he said. It’s private."
The controversy at Firhill is the latest in a string of high-profile incidents involving match officials in Scotland.
Dallas was at the centre of another storm as he awarded a highly controversial penalty to St Johnstone against Hearts, and Tynecastle manager Craig Levein received a one-match ban for comments about referee Bobby Madden after a defeat to Rangers.
Celtic also issued a statement after referee John Beaton decided not to send off Rangers striker Alfredo Morelos in the recent Old Firm game, with the official subsequently calling in police after receiving threats towards both himself and his family.
Meanwhile, Caldwell said he was unaware of coins being thrown in his direction from the Falkirk end during yesterday's match.
A Firhill steward reported coins being thrown at the 36-year-old from the Colin Weir Stand behind the dugouts.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel