FOUR-TIME world time trial champion Tony Martin has called the decision not to suspend Team Sky leader Chris Froome immediately for his adverse drugs test a “scandal”.
In a post on his Facebook page, the 32-year-old German wrote he was “totally angry” and suggested Froome and his British team “enjoy a special status”.
Martin is particularly annoyed that the International Cycling Union (UCI) let Froome ride in the time trial at the Road World Championships on September 20 despite telling him that day about his adverse analytical finding at La Vuelta a Espana a fortnight earlier.
Froome came third in Bergen, winning a bronze medal that he said at the time “capped an amazing season”. Martin finished a disappointing ninth.
In its letter to Froome and his national governing body, British Cycling, the UCI made it clear that he was not subject to a mandatory suspension.
One of the sport’s most respected riders, Martin wrote: “I am totally angry. There is definitely a double standard being applied in the Christopher Froome case.
“Other athletes are suspended immediately after a positive test. He and his team are given time by the UCI to explain it all. I do not know of any similar case in the recent past.
“That is a scandal, and he should at least not have been allowed to appear in the World Championships.
“Not only the public, but also I immediately have the impression that there is wheeling and dealing going on behind the scenes, agreements are being made and ways are being sought as to how to get out of this case. Do he and his team enjoy a special status?
“These actions are major blow to the difficult anti-doping fight...we need a consequent and transparent approach by the UCI. What is going on here is inconsistent, not transparent, unprofessional and unfair.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel