IAN Poulter has retained his PGA Tour card after fellow professional Brian Gay alerted officials to a discrepancy in the points structure used for players competing on major medical extensions.
After playing just 13 tournaments last year due to a foot injury, Poulter had 10 events this season to earn 218 FedEx Cup points, or $347,634, to remain fully exempt.
He came up short in both categories with 155 FedEx Cup points and $317,010, but Gay, who was also playing on a medical exemption after back problems, unexpectedly came to the rescue.
“Obviously [it’s] quite a relief to know that I can play my schedule and plan my schedule for the rest of 2017,” Poulter said after Saturday’s third round of the Zurich Classic of New Orleans.
“Being in kind of no-man’s-land, not knowing whether you’re going to play golf, is very tough.”
Gay had earned enough money to retain his card but not sufficient points to qualify for the Players Championship, which prompted him to discover a difference between the way points were allotted this season compared to a year ago. The new structure offered significantly fewer points for players finishing between 15th and 68th – a scenario which the PGA Tour said “unintentionally made it more difficult for these players to retain their exempt status”.
The PGA Tour statement continued: “The spirit of the medical extension has always been to provide the same opportunity a player would have had if he had not been injured to retain his card, and in this case the bar was moved significantly.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here