DAVID Haye has hit out at “insane” plans to allow professional boxers to compete at the Olympics, warning it would put fighters’ health and safety at serious risk.
Last month, AIBA president Ching-Kuo Wu said the sport’s world governing body intended to open up the Rio 2016 qualifying process to full-time professionals.
The controversial plans have been met by vocal criticism from a number of senior figures, which former world heavyweight champion Haye added to yesterday. The 35-year-old called the proposals “crazy” and warned it would not only stunt the development of fighters but could potentially lead to serious injury.
“You get these young kids who are training their whole life to go to the Olympics,” Haye said. “To go there and not fight someone else like them but fight someone who might have won an Olympics before, been a world champion and is just coming back to fight some kids, I think is insane.
“I think you’re going to get some young kids hurt and you’re definitely going to stunt the growth of these young kids. Some kids may be able to handle it, but a lot of them won’t.
“How would you feel if your 17-year-old son was playing on a rugby team and all of a sudden he was playing Harlequins? The kid would get absolutely mullered, completely smashed to bits.
“Then they would think ‘rugby’s not for me’. They’ll never become a professional because they’ve been so badly injured by these big, strong guys. Or a college American football team playing a professional NFL team – it’s just not fair. One is men, one is kids. It just makes zero sense.”
Haye believes the decision is borne out of the AIBA’s desire to monetise their product and claims he does not know of any professional boxers planning to put themselves forward for the Olympics.
While he understands some could see the Games as a chance to kick-start a faltering career, the heavyweight boxer believes amateur boxers need better protection.
“To go back from [making it as a professional], it just seems like a cheat,” Haye said of the plans, which will go before AIBA’s organisation Extraordinary Congress in May.
“All it’s going to take is one 17-year-old kid from Sweden fighting an American 30-year-old world champion who puts the poor kid into a coma, and then everyone will go ‘why did you allow that to happen’?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here