SUMMER recess is always one of the best times of the year for MPs and not just because you don’t have to deal with Westminster. Mainly it’s because you get to see the amazing work that so many of our local organisations do with their summer galas and the holiday programmes.
I have thoroughly enjoyed being able to visit many of these events as it is a welcome tonic to the toxicity of Westminster and the constant talking down of the city I represent – Glasgow – that you see in the local press, mainly by Labour politicians.
The holiday programme the SNP Glasgow City Council administration introduced has been one of the best initiatives the city has seen in years, and that’s not just my opinion – it is what community organisations across my constituency have told me.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Land ownership reform key to Scots confidence in indy
What sets this apart from things we have seen before is that it isn’t the council turning up for a few weeks in the summer and running identical programmes in each area – local organisations with local knowledge are being empowered to do it themselves.
In Glasgow, we are blessed with a richness of community and youth groups which know their areas and their people better than any council or government department ever could, so funding them to continue their work through the summer is a no-brainer.
This is a total change from the paternalistic and centralising approach of previous Labour councils and that trust and partnership working with communities is not only better appreciated but it leads to much better results as well.
Politics, locally and nationally, should be about doing things with people rather than to them. We have seen the consequences of a lack of resilience in communities when the shock of the financial crisis resulted in far less money being spent by public bodies and as services were cut communities went without.
The less reliant any group or community is on one source of funding or one service provider, the more able they are to weather the next storm.
The Community Empowerment Act was one of the ways in which the Scottish Government wanted to address the problem of people and communities feeling disconnected from decision-making and not having a stake in the areas they live.
The People Make Glasgow Communities programme has been how Glasgow is dealing with the asset transfer aspect of this and has had some hugely successful examples already.
St Paul’s Youth Forum in Blackhill has recently taken over the Molendinar Community Centre, employing half a dozen residents, enabling a local young man to open up a gym business and putting on activities from kids’ clubs to line dancing for the people of the surrounding area.
Its leader, Neil, told me: “We couldn’t do this ourselves, Glasgow Life couldn’t do this itself, but as a partnership, we will be able to deliver more for this community than ever before.
There have been more than 600 notes of interest by groups across the city at various stages of the process but this is a far cry from the fire sale that the usual naysayers claimed.
READ MORE: Only TWO communities try (and fail) to take land into public ownership in five years
This is community empowerment in action – it is partnership working between politicians and community organisations to deliver better outcomes for local people, and surely that’s what it’s all about.
The incessant negativity will only increase as we get closer to a General Election. Labour will tell us that Glasgow is uniquely terrible, that the difficulties our city faces are not the consequences of the pandemic, Tory austerity and Labour’s disgraceful history of discriminating against women leaving the city with an almost £1 billion mess to clean up.
But if we look up from the faux-outrage headlines and the hyper-partisan timelines, we will see communities that are beginning to thrive once more.
Investment is getting to the right places and people and they are having their voices heard and taking part in the decisions that directly impact their lives.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel