FOR some time now, I have followed what you have published about the Gender Recognition Reform Bill with a mixture of concern, hope and irritation.
I am the parent of a child who felt they were in the wrong body from pre-school age – and that was in the 1970s! But provided a child is accepted for their own personality, that childhood can still be a fairly happy one.
Problems arise when others won’t accept this. It was worrying as a parent to realise your young adult offspring could suffer an unprovoked attack from some complete stranger – simply because that bigot wasn’t sure of the gender of their victim. (Yes, it happened more than once.)
Do these people so objecting to this new legislation (which is already in place in several other countries) never stop and try to think what life is like for the families of the trans folk, let alone these individuals who are merely trying bravely “to be true to myself”, as my young adult put it 20 years ago? It’s not easy, you know.
I remember once at an airport during that long transition period, watching the cold, unfriendly scrutiny of the passport official, such that I went up to the desk to reassure the woman that yes, as the parent of my 20-something “child”, I could assert this was the bona fide person on that document.
I’m not disputing that there might perhaps be a rare occurrence of a bad ’un abusing these new laws, but has life ever been perfect? The chances of harm are so likely to be minuscule alongside the various sufferings that trans folk experience.
Have your readers any notion of the suicides because of society’s attitudes? I have, I was once asked to meet and so comfort and encourage another mother struggling to accept this difficult situation. It never happened, for her child took their own life before ever we managed to arrange it. I’ve often thought since of that poor mother left with her grief.
A recent National correspondent wrote as if the possible rare felonies which are unlikely anyway to result from this new legislation had already become the norm. How ridiculous! In our case, Scotland gave the education, but our child chose after transitioning to live overseas in a younger, more open-minded country where no-one knew about a different-gendered past.
Thus a career working on anger management with violent prisoners; to rehabilitate traumatised former soldiers; and now to bring together people of different races and religions – well, that has been Scotland’s loss! And don’t you reckon we need such an individual (who has always been loved in every post taken) here, if Scotland is to have a brighter future?
Who are these anti-trans demonstrators anyway? It doesn’t look as if they are aware of the need for empathy. They can’t be “family” orientated, for trans people need their families more than most.
To my mind, they certainly can’t be CHRISTians, for that name is adopted by those who aim to live their lives following the one who reached out to and welcomed the outcasts and shunned of society. Who on earth are they, and why are they so? That is the real puzzle in all this.
A Proud Parent (name and address supplied)
LET’S throw Westminster a curve ball. I suggest the Scottish Parliament has a vote on leaving the Union on the grounds that the Westminster government has broken the Act of Union on numerous occasions.
Within the bill will be a date set for the people of Scotland to have a vote on rejoining the Union. This would actually let the people of Scotland have a democratic choice of joining, unlike the original act which was signed under duress and corruption by a handful of lords.
F Paterson
Dunlop
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here