I MUST say it is awfully big of Alex Cole-Hamilton’s Liberal Democrats to have removed some Tories in English by-elections (Scottish LibDems ‘won’t play the game’ on plans for de facto vote, Dec 3).
As far as I can tell the LibDems have won four by-elections out of a possible 16 over the last two parliaments. It’ll take some time for the Tories to be shifted by the LibDems at that rate.
What might have been far more helpful would have been the LibDems not allowing more than 300 Tories the keys to the castle in 2010, when they entered into a coalition that ushered in more than a decade of austerity and proved the hand maidens to Brexit and the most calamitous and extreme right-wing government these islands have ever seen.
READ MORE: Poll shows why SNP’s plan for the next General Election is a bad idea
All the while, in Scotland, democracy is denied the Scottish people whose votes are disregarded by the ultra-British nationalists in London and more shockingly by their branch officers in Scotland. To paraphrase Henry Ford, it seems Scotland is allowed any government it wants as long as it is Unionist!
The LibDems should be held to account each and every day and made never to forget that damaging decision for Scotland and her people.
Kevin Cordell
Dundee
ALEX Cole-Hamilton’s LibDems are neither liberal nor democratic. After spending five years in a seamless de facto coalition with the Tories in Westminster that laid the foundations for present-day Tory policies, they are now demanding that the SNP and Scottish Green Party ditch their manifesto commitments to an independence referendum as easily as the LibDem MPs ditched their individually signed promise to oppose an increase in student university fees.
Alex Cole-Hamilton is the LibDems’ equivalent in Holyrood of Labour’s Ian Murray in Westminster – in thrall to the anti-SNP Unionists in his constituency; there is absolutely no possibility of the LibDems replacing a significant number of Tories or Labour in Westminster or Holyrood in the near future.
READ MORE: Latest independence poll is a mixed bag for Yes movement
The LibDems can produce as many policies as they like on the cost of living, the NHS and the climate crisis but the voters can see that they are once again in alliance with the Tories, now on Scottish councils.
Surely Alex Cole-Hamilton can not have forgotten already the “unspeakable arrogance” of the LibDems after the council elections in May when they joined alliances with the Tory and Labour parties, dictating that SNP policies that had won the support of more voters than those of any other party would be replaced with a hastily cobbled together hotch potch of opposition parties’ manifestos.
John Jamieson
South Queensferry
YOU report that the stance of the Scottish LibDems on the proposed de facto referendum “was confirmed at a special meeting of LibDem members earlier this week.” Can anyone advise me at what telephone box the “special meeting” was convened? Perhaps it was in Wee Willie Rennie’s favourite hideaway, the soft play park in Cumbernauld.
Jim Todd
Cumbernauld
I’M writing in response to Alex Cole-Hamilton’s recent remarks saying the people of Ross, Skye and Lochaber have been deprived of decent representation since the loss of Charles Kennedy and that Ian Blackford isn’t fit to represent us.
I feel lucky to have been represented by both Charles Kennedy and Ian Blackford as my Westminster MP over the years, and have had positive contact with both of them. To take a sideways swipe at Ian Blackford like this feels childish and leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. You might not agree with Ian’s politics, Alex – fair enough – but don’t come out with some off-the-cuff remark that is unfair and untrue.
Hilary de Vries
Ross-shire
IN Sunday’s letter from your regular contributor Ivor Telfer, he wondered what was the Gaelic for Yma o Hyd, we are still here. As a learner in the earlier part of my journey, I suggest “Tha sinn fhathast an seo”. Does someone with a fuller knowledge know a better one?
I would strongly recommend that Mr Telfer try to learn at least a little of it. He will be surprised how many of what I thought of as old Scots words had a Gaelic origin. To get started there are many courses online; there was a recent piece in The National rightly praising Duolingo.
READ MORE: What happened when I tried learning Gaelic on Duolingo
He bemoans the lack of Gaelic survival in his home patch of the central Borders. There are still elements if you look closely there. The burg motto of Hawick, Quoting from memory "Ye Teribus y Teriodin" sounds like a mangled version of a phrase in Brithonic Gaelic, the ancestor of modern Welsh, continually repeated though the original meaning was lost.
I would heartily recommend that everyone try to get a little familiarity with Gaelic. Everyone makes lots of mistakes, but that is not important.
What is important “Is fear Gaidhlig bhriste na Gaidhlig san uaigh”. Better broken Gaelic than Gaelic in the grave.
David Rowe
Beith
SPEED, acceleration, wild overtaking and a tragic increase of more than 20% in Scottish road fatalities last year (Road deaths up sharply but reduction in serious injuries, Dec 3). No mention of the wildlife killed: badgers, squirrels, even an otter on the roadside last week. Fancy cars and fast driving, the cult of the motor car – preferably large, or better still an open-top model with a noise-enhancing exhaust pipe. It’s the status symbol of a society in a hurry. Oh for the days when the Highlands had a peaceful pace of life, and flocks of birds rather than motorbikes on the North Coast 500.
Iain R Thomson
Strathglass
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel