TIME to take proper stock. It’s far too tempting at roadblocks like these to leap with Olympian ease to all manner of “solutions” to Scotland’s constitutional crisis. Yet what we do and how we do it has arguably never mattered more.
In my book, our future has never been a matter for m’learned friends, though ultimately, it will require skilled and committed negotiators from both London and Edinburgh. For, as must be clear even to the most rabid Unionist, this is not the end of our story, but the end of its over-lengthy beginning.
The idea of a “plebiscite election”, initially rejected, now adopted by the Scottish Government, brings in its wake very many legitimate questions. It’s right that there should be a special conference of SNP members to interrogate the idea and examine how and if it can fly.
Yet it’s also long past time to acknowledge that this is no longer just a matter for them. The rallies which post-dated the Supreme Court verdict were orchestrated by grassroots activists who put in a serious shift before the FM emerged to talk to the Edinburgh gathering.
The SNP, by virtue of their numerical superiority and their electoral record, have earned the right to be the lead vehicle along the road to independence. But it has to be a comradely convoy, not an entitled procession.
Revolutions never succeed as top-down affairs. They succeed when the poor bloody electoral infantry know in their bones that enough is enough and act accordingly.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon will lead Scotland to independence, Brian Cox says
It’s one of the reasons I’ve hae’d ma doots about setting up any new party – the political graveyard is littered with them – or for that matter, shoring up the numbers with an over-hasty coalition.
I’m not sure the SNP would have got themselves in such an endless fankle over GRA were it not a basic article of faith with the Greens, some of whom actually think the proposed legislation doesn’t go far enough!
Meanwhile, I’m deeply suspicious of the narrative which has emerged in both the print and electronic media, that independence should be safely popped on the back burner until the Scottish Government has fixed all that assails us. And be seen to do so competently.
By absolutely no accident, it’s not a million miles from the Tory battle cry of “now is not the time”. Trust me, for them, now will never be the time. Colonial governor-general Alister, shortly Lord, Jack let the cat leap from the bag in the Commons when he talked about Westminster being “the custodian of the devolution settlement”.
Not a partner in a joint or voluntary union; that fairytale is well dead. It’s their bat and their ba’, and, as he once also inelegantly observed, we just have to “suck it up”.
When he sinks into richly deserved political oblivion after the next general election, he will nevertheless be able to pop his well-heeled bahookie on the red benches of that other raging anachronism, the House of Lords. No matter who was PM, through it all, Alister kept his focus firmly on keeping his job. Blessed are the brown-nosers, for they will always inherit an earthly sinecure.
The problem as I see it is not that the Scottish Government has failed to focus on the “day job”; it’s that the day job is sometimes so all-consuming that there’s little time left over for indy activism.
The ferry debacle and the knock-on effect on our island communities has been a bourach right enough. Yet a small-scale one compared to the billions the long-delayed London Crossrail cost, or the billions being poured into the black hole of HS2 or Sizewell.
Show us you can govern, and govern well, and the prize shall be yours is the seductive mood music being played by the faux fairweather friends of independence. Played by those who would cut their tongues out rather than admit that Scotland’s government, in a bad light, is three times as progressive as the neanderthal wing of the Conservative Party.
If you want an example of incompetent government and full-throated capitalism, look no further than the collapse of Carillion, one of the Conservatives’ most favoured contractors.
When it went bust in 2018 with debts of £7bn, 3000 direct employees lost their jobs, whilst chaos reigned in everything from major construction projects to school meals and hospital cleaning, such was the spread of its contracted tentacles. All part of the private sector good, public services bad philosophy of consecutive Tory administrations.
When the solid matter hits the fan, chancellors like Rishi Sunak can print enough money to paper over very large cracks, an avenue closed to subservient governments like ours, obliged by law to balance its books, accept annual pocket money and have minimal access to borrowing.
That’s why independence is not a distraction – it’s an escape tunnel from the shambles down south. From mini-budgets to Brexit, these guys have served up serial disasters of which we are collateral damage.
The real day job should be finding a way to uncouple ourselves from this unlovely shower and its taste for casual corruption. That its Scottish underlings should have the nerve to lecture us on good governance is beyond arrogant. Better together – not!
Planning this escape route will not be simple. The SNP, I’m guessing, will revert to “both votes SNP” in a bid to get the outright majority they missed by one seat last time around. Scottish Labour are already saying that the only way to ensure a Tory-free Scotland is to go back to nanny and vote for them.
READ MORE: SNP: Section 30 would 'honour democracy' after de facto referendum
They are hard at work punting the latest upcoming tablets of constitutional stone from Gordon Brown, probably mini federalism 32.0. It’s a very auld sang and one not being sung by Keir Starmer, who, wrapped in many Union flags, could not be clearer that he wants no truck with a Free Scotland.
I don’t doubt GB is sincere in his prescription. I don’t doubt it will be chucked in the nearest bin post-election.
If anyone out there thinks that the way for Scotland to be able to choose its own future lies in a particularly unsavoury form of internecine warfare, then I suggest they check their history books.
And that goes for the Government as well as its more intractable and vocal critics. Division is a one-way ticket to independence doom.
ONE of the many ways in which this constitutional wrangling has distorted normal political discourse is that it often fails to look at what the politics of a post-independence landscape might look like.
It will result in a changed Scottish National Party. If they are smart enough, it should result in free-standing Labour, Tory and LibDem Scottish parties. They too would benefit from a London divorce. The Greens already have their divorce from colleagues in England and Wales, although you will be less than gobsmacked to learn that stemmed from a trans row.
What we all have to recognise is that if we want to avoid the debate becoming an, ahem, de facto Groundhog Day, we have to do some serious scenario planning. Some of these hard yards have already been trodden by pro-independence think tanks like Believe In Scotland and Common Weal.
They must not be closed off from discussions on how we move forward. Nor must the many Yes Hubs who came out in the rain in their hundreds to call for basic democracy to be respected last Thursday.
Let’s use their powerful energy to fuel the next steps. One caller to Radio Scotland opined that if Yes won a plebiscite election and still got a dizzie, then we would be left with “the square root of hee haw”.
He has a point.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel