I NOTE that under plans to redraw Britain’s electoral boundaries the SNP is to lose two of its Westminster MPs. This must surely be good news for Scottish nationalists who feel that the continued presence of dozens of SNP people at Westminster kind of undermines their argument for withdrawing from the UK.
It’s also an opportunity for the SNP to inject a measure of radicalism, not to mention fun, into this political version of Musical Chairs. Rather than simply wait for the Boundary Commission’s proposals to be formally ratified, I think the SNP should draw up a shortlist of their least effective MPs (there are many candidates, so this shouldn’t be a problem).
They should all then be faced with a series of questions, including: how much have you advanced the cause of independence in your time at Westminster?
Outline your plans to address the toxic culture of misogynistic bullying and intimidation that exists within the SNP’s Westminster group.
READ MORE: The six constituencies hit hardest by plans to cut Scotland's MPs
How many friends and family have you put on the office payroll?
Express as a fraction the number of times you’ve opened your mouth at Westminster about Scottish independence compared with the free dinners you receive at black tie events and sundry other refulgent occasions in London’s dizzying social whirl. There should then be a vote by the SNP’s entire membership. I’d propose that The National provides its multi-platform expertise in hosting these hustings.
The losing two candidates would then be formally de-selected and their places automatically taken by the two sitting MPs whose constituencies are set to disappear under the changes.
THIS diary is nothing if not civic-minded and so, in a spirit of generosity and selfless devotion to the cause of independence, I’ll provide potential candidates for the chop over the course of the next four weeks.
Here’s the first in the series: “I’m Supposed to be a Nationalist: Get Me Out of Here.”
Pete Wishart, the MP for Perth and North Perthshire is known throughout the independence movement by the affectionate nickname “Slippers”. This does not refer to his fondness for the stalwart leisure footwear. Rather it denotes a fondness for the easy life at Westminster without having actually contributed anything meaningful to the cause he’s supposed to represent.
In 21 forgettable years as an MP, he is best known for seeking to become the House of Commons Speaker, a position which – ironically – comes with regulation issue soft shoes.
He now spends most of his time on Twitter hurling childish imprecations at the Alba Party on Twitter.
Readers’ suggestions for other Nationalist MPs who could be candidates for the chop-list are welcomed.
POLITICIANS on enforced sabbatical will never be short of employment opportunities. Such is their acumen for being all things to all people there will always be opportunities to reinvent themselves as television cooks and gourmands. In any given week in the UK there are up to 10 television programmes devoted to food.
Saturday mornings on British television were once devoted to children’s entertainment with programmes such as Swap Shop and Tiswas. Now, they have become the preserve of affluent and footless middle-class C-list celebrities with hard-working agents.
They gather in outsize kitchens the size of your average car showroom and fill the time between making abstruse culinary concoctions with asinine anecdotes about life in the slow lane of showbiz.
As Britain enters recession and ordinary families struggle to feed their children, they are effectively being trolled by the television companies. “Press your nose up against the window: this is what you too could have if you lived in a large house and have an annual income of £250k.
TO Glasgow University’s Dumfries campus for the latest in their series of Future Shock debates about making our services and institutions more resilient when the next global catastrophe hits.
Highlight of the day was the contribution by Lorraine McGrath of the Simon Community which works to alleviate the isolation of homeless people and those sleeping rough.
She outlines how homelessness and rough sleeping was almost completely eradicated in Glasgow and Edinburgh within four days of the Covid lockdown.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar and Douglas Ross should tell us where the axe should fall
With the help of the Scottish Government, hotels were made available to accommodate both cities’ homeless. Then the staff and volunteers of the Simon Community got to work, providing lifeline help and health services and reconnecting some people with families and systems of support.
“It conveyed a message to people who were unused to be being included and being told their health and wellbeing didn’t matter,” said Lorraine.
Nurses came in to give vaccinations and, at last, these men and women were finally being reached and told that they mattered and could be cared for.
She reports that, following the pandemic, the numbers of rough sleepers in our two biggest cities remain in single figures in Glasgow and between 10 and 20 in Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel