LABOUR leader Keir Starmer had an interview yesterday with BBC Scotland's Sunday Show. It was meant to be his big chance to connect with voters in Scotland, to demonstrate that he understands the wishes and concerns of the Scottish electorate. It's not merely that Starmer missed the point, he showed no real awareness of the general direction in which the point lied. It's safe to say that he didn't score a bullseye, if it had been a darts match his dart would have ended up in the eye of an audience member.
READ MORE: Ex-Labour MP slams Keir Starmer for 'patronising' Scots with 'Tory language'
To all intents and purposes it was like listening to a Conservative party leader. This is a man who in his desperation to court Brexit-backing voters in northern England is determined to keep the UK out of the European Union – and will not revisit the questions of British membership of the Customs Union. He seemingly expects voters in overwhelmingly pro-European Scotland to go along with this for reasons which are entirely opaque.
Starmer seems to think that the people of Scotland will vote for Tory policies as long as they are being proposed by the Labour party. This is a Labour leader who has learned absolutely nothing from the electoral collapse of Labour in Scotland since 2014.
The attitude is still very much: "It's not me, it's you." The Labour party can continue to keep doing what it has always done, it's the voters of Scotland who need to change.
This was most evident when Starmer was asked what he would say to former Labour voters in Scotland who have switched en masse to the SNP. Starmer's reply was exactly what we would have expected from a Conservative leader and showed not the slightest awareness of the Scottish perspective. He said: "I really don't think that everyone across Scotland is completely immune from the cost of living, isn't bothered about their bills, doesn't worry about their shopping, doesn't worry about their mortgage, they're simply thinking about independence, I just don't accept that."
And there went that dart into the eye of an audience member.
Of course people in Scotland are worried about the cost of living and all the rest, but the point that Starmer willfully refuses to accept is that people in Scotland who support independence overwhelmingly do so because they see independence as the means by which these other issues can be addressed, and addressed in a fairer and above all more accountable way than is possible within the sclerotic structures of a systematically unjust British state. Here, privilege and patronage rule supreme. As we have seen over the past few years, any democratic safeguards have been hollowed out to the point of uselessness.
However it was in his reply to a question about the democratic route to another independence vote that Starmer revealed his real quasi-colonialist patrician and patronising attitude. He insisted that the UK is a voluntary Union, but refused to specify any mechanism through which Scotland could bring about a referendum on independence. He went further, insisting that he would still oppose another independence referendum even if the Supreme Court were to rule that Holyrood could hold one without Westminster's permission. He told the interviewer, and by extension the people of Scotland, what our priorities really ought to be.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer panned for saying UK recruits too many overseas workers into NHS
It's the exact same insulting denial of Scottish democracy that we have come to know and loathe from Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak. We don't need some London politician to tell Scotland what its priorities ought to be, the voters of this country are perfectly capable of deciding that for themselves.
Starmer in his arrogant ignorance maintained that if the Supreme Court does rule in favour of the Scottish Government this still does not settle the political question of whether there should be another referendum.
But that was the political question put to the people of Scotland in the Holyrood election of May 2022. The political question is settled. The people responded resoundingly in the affirmative, electing a Scottish Parliament with its largest ever pro-independence majority. It is not for Starmer or any other Westminster politician to gainsay them.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel