UNIVERSAL free school meals for primary school children is not perhaps the most headline-grabbing achievement of devolution, but in terms of what it means for children’s health and educational prospects it should be right up there with abolishing university fees and the smoking ban.
From today all primary fives across Scotland, regardless of their parents financial status, will be able to access a free school meal. Last August all primary fours were also brought into the scheme. That means that 90,000 extra children can now get a healthy free lunch.
The Scottish Government did commit itself to rolling out free meals to all primary children by August 2022 but that commitment was dropped during last month’s Budget. Now ministers say the policy will be implemented by the end of this parliamentary term.
It’s just another twist in the journey of this policy since the Scottish Parliament came into existence. What is undeniable is that those who set out universal free school meals as an ambition many years ago have won the political argument. The disagreements are now over timescales and budgets.
READ MORE: Trade union calls for free school meals for all pupils
During the first eight years of Holyrood, the Labour/LibDem Scottish Executive set itself against universal free school meals. Along with the Conservatives, it voted down a members bill by a Scottish Socialist MSP that would have provided all Scottish primary kids with a free lunch. In March 2007, then Labour education secretary Hugh Henry said the party would never back this universal benefit for children. It did however promise to offer more targeted support for less well off children if it won the upcoming May election. Labour, of course, lost to the SNP in the party’s first ever Holyrood election success.
The SNP had included the introduction of universal free school meals in its manifesto. But it took a long time for the policy to get off the ground and it wasn’t until January 2014 that then First Minister Alex Salmond announced that all primary children in years one to three would get a free lunch at school.
The move was greeted with approval from a host of child welfare groups, trade unions and teachers themselves. There were a few grumbles about the long delay in getting the policy finally started but most agreed it was better late than never. All apart from the Labour Party. Then leader Johann Lamont announced she would oppose the policy, instead advocating means testing. It was yet another sign that the party was completely out of touch with its own former supporters. The Labour-supporting Daily Record wrote an editorial pointing out how barking mad Lamont’s position was.
It’s testament to the complete victory of the political argument that every party has now adopted the policy as its official position with Labour now arguing for further expansion.
It can also be seen as a true victory for devolution. You only have to look at the UK Government’s behaviour towards targeted meals for children during the pandemic to see where their priorities lie. The fact that it took a young footballer in Marcus Rashford (below) to shame the Tories into some kind of action on this issue is disgraceful.
But aside from the political journey the policy has had over the years at Holyrood, what benefits do universal free school meals bring?
A study from Sweden’s Lund University found that decades of universal free school meals in that country produced profound health and economic benefits: children would grow taller, live longer healthier lives and would have better more highly paid careers. The effects on children from poorer families was even more marked. Petter Lundborg, co-author of the study stated: “Today, we take school lunches for granted in Sweden. But the fact is, it was a very conscious investment when Sweden introduced free lunches in the 1940s.”
This has always been the argument used by those advocating the policy in Scotland. This is not a hand out or a something for nothing culture as Lamont once said but a sound, practical investment in our children.
Neil Cowan from The Poverty Alliance says that the political consensus around universal free school meals for primary kids is proof positive that all parties recognise that child poverty is on the rise in Scotland, as it is throughout the UK.
READ MORE: Outrage over 'woefully inadequate' free school meals parcels for families in England
“It’s evident to everyone that many families are poorer now than they were 10 years ago” he says. “Universal free school meals is an excellent policy that helps mitigate some of the worse effects of child poverty. Its not a solution in itself but its a very important measure.”
Cowan believes the health benefits and educational benefits are undeniable. “Many kids come to school hungry and hungry children cant concentrate properly. The other important thing about this policy is its universality. It removes the stigma and that more than outweighs any benefits that would come through a more targeted rollout.”
However, he believes there is still much to be done. “Obviously it’s a disappointment that the government has rowed back on its committed for this to be available from P1 to P7 by August this year. I would urged ministers to stick to that promise and get things clarified ASAP. Ultimately I would like to see universal free school meals being made available to children in secondary schools as well.”
Peter Henderson is a journalist
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel