COP26 brought the trade union movement sharply back into the spotlight in Scotland. As with any news cycle though, attention moves on, and while the rats in Glasgow haven’t moved on, their press coverage certainly has.
With the dust settling and with the ability to look at that situation from a new perspective, it now seems that the GMB as a union lost control of what was going on locally and that the activists on the ground were calling the shots; and while Anas Sarwar may have tried to capitalise on the situation, it certainly wasn’t driven by him.
He is apparently as much in touch with the trade unions as his boss Keir Starmer, who must take full responsibility for the announcement from the Unite union that they have officially cut their political funding of the Labour Party. Though still remaining affiliated, this is a clear indication of the massive gulf which now exists between the Labour Party and the trade union movement.
At a UK level we are seeing trade unions taking stock of their relationship with the Labour Party, and many don’t like what they see. They see a party which endorsed privatisation and which, in actions if not words, is indistinguishable from the Tories.
Unite now seek to back the political parties and causes which best serve their members, and this mirrors the action carried out by the RMT in 2004 where they backed the Scottish Socialist Party, an action which led to their complete disaffiliation from the UK Labour Party.
This freedom to choose a path in line with members’ wishes saw the RMT back independence in 2014 after balloting its members, while other unions with strong ties to Labour backed Better Together without consultation.
It was this act which saw many members desert the trade union movement in Scotland and which has led to the formation of Trade Unionists for Independence, who believe that strong trade union representation is vital and that we need to get active in our unions – otherwise we not only lose the rights and protections we have gained, but we hand those organisations to the British nationalists by default.
A fantastic example of action by pro-independence activists within their trade unions is the breaking news that the Communications Workers Union (CWU) – which backed the No campaign in 2014 without consultation with the grass roots membership, and which used their money to support Better Together – has now voted at their annual conference to instruct their National Executive to support both the democratic right of the Scottish Parliament to hold an independence referendum and also the democratic right of the Scottish people to determine their own future.
This is a massive win for the Yes movement and is a real sign that in any future referendum campaign the British nationalists cannot rely on the broad support of the trade union movement, and that there is a real recognition of the benefits of independence within the wider trade union movement.
I would again encourage anyone who is not a trade union member to join one, and to be an active and vocal voice for independence for Scotland within that union. By doing so we will speed the day when we see the trade unions back Scottish independence wholeheartedly – and with that perhaps even the Labour Party too, which would leave the Tories as the isolated defenders of the Union in Scotland.
When that point is reached then independence will surely be imminent and we can perhaps finally get on with building the better Scotland we have been dreaming of.
The dream will not have died, it will be reality.
James Cassidy
Trade Unionists for Independence
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel