I HAVE no argument with the widespread calls for improvement and increased provision of drug rehabilitation services. But I do despair at the widespread apparent acceptance of the inevitability of addiction. Prevention is a desirable aim, and I look in vain for any acknowledgement from the likes of Douglas Ross that Tory austerity could possibly have a part to play in the present state of affairs.
I thoroughly approve of Angela Constance’s passing reference to the part played by poverty and deprivation, and the aims of the Scottish Government’s Social Justice Commission. But it’s not enough to acknowledge these important glimmers of hope for the future only occasionally.
READ MORE: Drug deaths in England and Wales at highest level since records began
It’s a counsel of despair to focus only on treating the damage already done, without constantly and assertively pointing out that one of the important treatable causes of the problem of addiction is income inequality. This includes Scotland’s status as a country without much control over the serious and growing income inequality affecting the whole UK, and that is exacerbated by Scotland’s obligation to have most of its taxes filtered through a neighbouring country’s Treasury where money is siphoned off to pay for abominations like Trident and the monarchy – to name only two from the long list.
Politicians and The National: please give the social and political aspects of prevention of addition equal importance alongside the nature and availability of treatment. If that leads to an accusation that the drug problem is being used as another argument for independence, then that makes the argument no less true.
Derek Ball
Bearsden
CONSERVATIVE MP Steve Baker said recently that the government was considering undoing the triple lock on the state pension. It infuriated me that the interviewer never retorted that we have one of the poorest state pensions in Europe.
Sandy Gordon
via email
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel