I ALWAYS enjoy reading Ruth Wishart’s column. I appreciate and understand her “mad as hell” feeling, which is common in our movement (I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take it any more, June 20). It prompted my letter.
I learnt very early in my political activism to think about and consider any struggle in an objective way (I had good teachers).
As regards our aim of independence, what do we have in our armoury at this present stage?
READ MORE: Yanis Varoufakis: EU would accept Scotland's membership application in 10 seconds
We have a newly elected SNP government. We have half the people of Scotland whom we can possibly assume – though not guarantee – will vote for self-determination given the opportunity. We have the possibility of SNP/Greens in some form of coalition government. We have an indyref campaign ready to go at the appropriate time. We now learn there is an independence unit under the leadership of Mike Russell.
Ruth writes that Nicola should shift her focus from the defeat of Covid, and give it to others. If she did this, the Unionists would attack her for a relinquishment of her First Minister responsibility.
What are we up against? A Johnson government that appears to hold almost all the aces. They have central, legal, constitutional and media power alongside a civil service at their command. We don’t yet know if it is a winning hand. We certainly face an unequal fight.
Sunday’s National contained views from Dr Alex Smith, a Scottish politics expert. Here are some of them: “The stakes for the SNP were really high”, “On the question of a referendum taking place sooner rather than later, what happens if the Yes camp loses a second time? If they lose in this context, it really will be a once-in-a-generation thing”, and “Timing is crucial ... getting the timing right is going to be a very, very tricky calculation”.
We should take serious note of his views.
Bobby Brennan
Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel