BREXIT'S "real impact" on Scotland will take many years to assess, according to a new report from the Scottish Government.
The report says “many of the negative impacts which were envisaged” at the time of the vote five years ago are only now “starting to crystallise”.
The Scottish Government paper claims Brexit is damaging business, migration and devolution itself, with External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson (below) insisting “Scotland has to consider its future path” when the coronavirus pandemic is over.
The report states: “We can already say with confidence that across a wide range of areas, Brexit is having a tangible and harmful impact on the quality of life of the people of Scotland and on Scottish businesses.
“It is not yet possible to describe the full impact that decision will have on the people of Scotland.
“Some consequences, such as parts of the new rules on trade into the UK, are not yet fully in force. For those that are, assessing the real impact will take many years.”
The Scottish Government has already warned that the “basic” trade deal agreed between the UK and EU could result in Scottish GDP being £9 billion lower by 2030, compared to if the UK remained part of Europe.
Meanwhile exports from the UK to the EU for the period January to April were down almost a fifth (19%) this year compared to 2018, with the report citing: “The difference is Brexit.”
While Scotland sent more than 70% of seafood exports to the EU in 2019, worth more than £770 million, the report notes total UK exports of fish this year are “27% lower than in the first four months of 2018”.
READ MORE: Yanis Varoufakis: EU would accept Scotland's membership application in 10 seconds
Looking at the impact on migration, it found the number of EU nationals registering for a National Insurance number in Scotland in the first three months of 2021 was 70% below pre-pandemic levels.
The report went on to warn “businesses planning to recruit from overseas are likely to face challenges”, citing research which said the lack of interest is “likely to be a consequence of the ending of freedom of movement for EU citizens in 2021 rather than the pandemic”.
Robertson said: “Five years ago Scotland did not vote for Brexit. As this review makes it clear: Scotland is now enduring an ever-lengthening catalogue of harms, inflicted on this country against its wishes.”
He said the report “makes for stark reading for anyone in Scotland concerned about this country’s future welfare”.
READ MORE: Scottish Government fund to 'repair' research links with EU after Brexit
He added: “From trade and business to education, to the futures and livelihoods of our fellow European citizens, from our farmers, our security, and devolution itself – all have been negatively impacted.
“It’s also increasingly apparent the trade deals being struck by the UK Government are simply not compensating for the loss of EU markets for Scottish businesses.
“The response to the Covid-19 pandemic remains paramount, but it is clear Brexit means Scotland has to consider its future path when the public health crisis is over. Then the people of this country can choose a future trapped in the damaging turmoil of the UK Government’s escalating hard Brexit – or as an independent country free to join its friends and partners in Europe.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel