I HAVE been very disappointed in the level of competence shown by TV debate moderators and the rudeness and sheer ignorance of some of the participants.
1. Speakers are permitted to interrupt others.
2. Moderators make no attempt to stop them.
3. The points are lost in the resultant confusing gabble.
4. The public interest in what is being said encourages a turn-off of unhelpful noise.
5. Where moderators also ask questions, some questions are not answered because the interviewer asks another preventing the first from being answered.
6. Time for answers should be rationed and so should time taken to ask each question.
7. Producer bias should be banished.
READ MORE: The most reliable prediction for this election is that predictions will be wrong
The remedies are:
1. Moderators should be retrained or sacked.
2. Programme producers should be vetted for bias.
3. All participants should have individual microphones centrally controlled.
4. A system of lights should be instituted to inform speakers when allotted times are exceeded.
5. Exceeding the agreed speaking time allowed should result in immediate microphone switch-off.
6. Interrupters should be immediately cut off until their own turn.
Such simple measures as above would improve programme quality immensely and the public would be able to discern what it was that individuals were attempting to say.
The public would be better informed instead of being enraged.
Admittedly there are one or two good interviewers/moderators, but they are rarely employed.
Dr Lindsay Neil
Selkirk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel