THE Institute for Fiscal Studies’ criticism of the SNP manifesto commitments on health, saying they are less ambitious than the Westminster Tories, is particularly unfair.
Boris and his party have made so many promises that have never been achieved across a raft of policy areas. They promised 20,000 more police officers, but instead there are 20,600 less than in 2010. They promised to protect workers’ rights, but then failed to back the SNP in their move to end the “fire and rehire” tactics that have become common since Covid-19. In spite of pledges to increase the number of nurses in mental health there are 4,200 fewer full-time equivalents working in this field.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rubbishes IFS claims about SNP spending pledge
Although the number of GPs employed in England has risen slightly, the number of full-time equivalents has actually fallen since 2015. Although it is acknowledged that Scotland is in desperate need for even more GPs, in 2019 the Scottish Government announced an increase of 55. In England, the latest data showed the number of GPs fell by 339 in the same period.
The SNP promises may not be as ambitious as some would like, but at least they are being delivered.
Pete Rowberry
Duns
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel