THE letter you published on Friday from Graham Smith of Arbroath is unhelpful to the cause of independence, in that it is simply factually WRONG.
He claims: "In past elections minor parties have never reached the 5% of the vote ... the Green party has been campaigning for many years now and even now, they have only recently broken the 5% barrier."
He is factually wrong because he conflates breaching the 5% barrier in a constituency with achieving it nationally. It’s the constituency which counts. Here are the facts:
In 1999, the Scottish Greens won one MSP, Robin Harper, the first Green politician elected anywhere in the UK.
In 2003 it won seven MSPs.
In 2007 this declined to two MSPs, but it gained several councillors.
In 2011, it retained two MSPs.
In 2016 this increased to six, now five, upon whom the SNP government depends to retain a pro-independence majority.
In 2021 I’m confident that Green MSP numbers will increase; polls suggest it will reach two figures for the first time.
READ MORE: Anything other than an SNP majority will simply be ignored
The only certain way to increase the number of pro-independence MSPs is to vote SNP for the constituency, and Green for the regional list. We can’t afford the luxury of getting this wrong by backing unproven new parties.
The recent plethora of "pro-independence" parties largely comprise people lacking political experience and stature. Voting Green on the list is the only way to increase the independence majority at Holyrood this critical year.
Dougie Harrison
Milngavie, Glasgow
I DO wish The National would be more sensitive when compiling its headlines. "Decommissioning role for Ross" followed by "Fond farewell to Holyrood" in Sunday's edition isn't for the faint-hearted!
Kenneth Burnett
Dyce, Aberdeen
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel