I MUST take issue with Andy Anderson in Friday’s Long Letter. The only time the Scottish National Party won a majority was by using SNP 1&2 voting. It is surely the objective to have the same result this time. Whilst it might be nice to decimate the Unionist parties’ representation, it is irrelevant in the scheme of things.
Should the SNP not obtain a majority of MSPs the London government will simply state, ad infinitum, that the party for independence and self-determination does not even have a majority in Scotland. They will not care one iota how many independence-supporting MSPs there are in the Parliament. They will only be concerned with preventing an SNP majority and being able to use that as their clarion call.
READ MORE: Wasting hundreds of thousands of SNP votes just doesn’t make sense to me
I have never heard of the founders of the Action for Independence Party and do not know if they are genuine self-determination supporters, Trojan horses, self-serving hopefuls, wolves in sheeps’ clothing, or just plain fools. I say this because anything which risks an SNP outright majority must be avoided.
We as a people, if we wish to get ourselves free of Westminster rule, need to hold fast and stick with the political arm of the Yes movement. I do not think the SNP will make the mistake of saying that this election is not about independence again, so we who want self-determination for Scotland should turn out and vote for them. There is no doubt they are not without human faults and failings, but this is not the time for division.
READ MORE: It’s fanciful to suggest any of the new pro-indy parties can win list seats
Andy finishes his letter saying “you know it makes sense,” but in actual fact it does NOT. We need to get a majority of SNP MSPs elected irrespective of any other considerations. I personally would like to be rid of the Willie Rennies, Ruth Davidson, Douglas Rosses, Jackie Baillies and Anas Sarwars from this political landscape but we must maximise the SNP vote and obtain a majority.
John Robson
Uddingston
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel