I HAVE to disagree with the Wee Ginger Dug’s views concerning Alyn Smith (It’s not the grassroots that need to ‘wheest for indy’, December 8). The only place Alyn Smith might put an oversize boot in is his own mouth. With every Facebook comment about his chip-on-the-shoulder NEC comments I read, I saw right through him as a self-indulgent politician who thought himself top of the tree.
Yes, he worked well for Scotland as an MEP, actually receiving a standing ovation for his famous speech about leaving a light on for Scotland after the UK Brexit vote. He then went on to win a seat as an SNP MP in Stirling.
His weekly column in The National, for quite a while, contained a lot of examples about his time as an MEP, and not so much of his actions in Westminster. But enough about Alyn Smith.
READ MORE: Referendum polling would strengthen the government’s hand
I also disagree with the Wee Ginger Dug’s viewpoint about our government. The only reason for the SNP’s existence is for Scotland’s independence. But in the meantime, it does have a country to govern, and right now an epidemic to deal with. If that is not enough, the First Minister chose to give out a daily synopsis of the effect the coronavirus epidemic is having on the Scottish nation.
I have always suspected that somewhere, in the background of dealing with the daily politics of government, our elected SNP members have always held independence as the means to an end. Government has been the SNP way, with a few compromises made here and there.
But, in a wee room tucked away out of sight, there has been a small working committee trying hard to find a way to independence beyond the impossible request for another Section30 order. It appears that those secret discussions just might be beginning to take shape.
READ MORE: We did not need marches and flag-waving to raise support for independence
Michael Russell has informed the nation that not only is there a way forward beyond the impossible Section 30 route, and not only is there not a need for a Plan B, but there is the possibility of several plans ranging from A to Z. This was broadcast to conference and subsequently published over social media but most of all, as front page news in last weekend’s Sunday’s National.
Discussions have been taking place in letters and on social media about alternative legal procedures to gain independence outwith the Section30 order. Even to the point of reinvigorating the 1707 Act of Union as a way of cutting the umbilical cord that attaches us to Westminster.
Similarly, so has our government been having these discussions, but obviously in secret. You don’t disclose your hand of cards when playing poker. Hopefully Mike Russell’s recent disclosure has been sufficient to placate the grassroots within the Yes community, enough to suggest to the other poker players that the SNP might just have a winning hand, and enough to wipe the table clear in the final game.
Alan Magnus-Bennett
Fife
YESterday photo appeal
The National is running a new monthly feature focused on the independence movement of years gone by. We would love to see photos of pre-2014 marches, rallies and events – as well as pictures of old pro-independence or SNP badges, T-shirts, flyers, posters, or other merchandise. Help us tell the stories which are too often left out of the mainstream independence narrative!
We’ll be publishing the best submissions once a month online and in the newspaper. Contribute online here or by sending contributions to: YESterday appeal, The National, c/o The Print Centre, 125 Fullarton Drive, Cambuslang, Glasgow, G32 8FG.
Please include a stamped, self-addressed envelope if you would like them returned.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel