I READ the Sunday National’s article “Voices for Scotland hoping to take over from Yes campaign for indyref2” with a mixture of disbelief and increasing concern. By about the third paragraph I was beginning to think, and hope, that this was some kind of rather well-written spoof story. Sadly it was not.
As if it were not bad enough that a number of pop up political parties are trying to slide their way on to the ballot paper for next May’s Scottish Parliament elections, we now have a number of pop-up political/civic organisations hoping to “lead the charge for indyref2”.
It seems that Audrey Birt, chair of Voices for Scotland (VfS), believes her organisation is “best placed” to carry on the work of Yes Scotland. My first thought was “who is Audrey Birt and why have I never heard of her?” A quick Google search for her and a look at the organisation’s website left me none the wiser.
READ MORE: Voices for Scotland hoping to take over from Yes campaign for indyref2
Apparently this pop-up organisation is funded by donations from £5 per month. I have to wonder who these folk are, what are their underlying political aims and how many of them actually exist? How will they take on the well-financed, media-led might of the Unionist campaign which will soon face us?
Audrey Birt apparently believes VfS is “best placed to take forward that non-party-political position”. She said “I think we are in a natural position to do that. We have got a lot of skill”. I can see absolutely no evidence of this.
As a lifelong supporter of independence, I find the SNP’s silence on the successor to Yes Scotland deafening. Where is the SNP’s leadership in all this? Where is the lead from the organisation with more than 100,000 paid-up members, stacks of MPs, loads of MSPs, hundreds of councillors and even its very own government?
Yes Scotland needs life breathed back into it. The SNP need to give it some CPR – and very soon please.
John Baird
Paisley
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here