WITH advancing age comes retirement, and the ability to sample daytime TV as often as wanted. Having long since resolved to not watch the regular antics of an assortment of moaning Unionist MSPs, Scottish Parliament TV is something I have not viewed for some time.
However, given the prospect of the long-awaited attendance of Scotland’s so-called top civil servant at the Holyrood inquiry, I decided to tune in and hear what had led the Scottish Government’s civil service to contest and then abandon a legal case involving the former First Minister, Alex Salmond.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond inquiry: Leslie Evans apologises for 'procedural failure'
Ms Evans (salary more than £165,000) apologised for the “procedural failure” and went on at length to justify the bungled investigations which eventually led to the judicial review which has cost the taxpayers of Scotland more than £500,000.
Sometime shortly after that I lost interest in the event, as a number of obvious questions were asked and obvious answers provided. The attraction of switching on the washing machine proved too much and I abandoned the TV in despair.
Putting aside the rights and wrongs of carrying out the actual investigation into these allegations from some time ago, I doubt that there is any chief executive of any company in the land (UK or Scotland) who would still be in post after having just lost half a million pounds of the company’s cash.
READ MORE: FM 'not aware' of advice to staff not be alone with Salmond
I had hoped the inquiry would be held over a number of consecutive days – perhaps lasting, at the very worst, a couple of weeks – but it seems we are to be faced with this dragging on one day a week for several months. In addition some of the important people and important papers will not actually form part of the investigation.
The prospect of a long drawn-out, depressing inquiry, which it appears will now focus on who said what to who, and when they said it, will do very little to enhance the reputation of the Scottish Government or Ms Evans.
I don’t think I will be watching any more of it.
John Baird
Paisley
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel