EXCELLENT articles from Lesley Riddoch and Joanna Cherry in yesterday’s paper. While Lesley’s outlines the developing support for independence boosted by Johnson’s “visit” to Scotland (Scots saw through Boris long ago ... but he’s welcome here to remind us, July 23), Joanna’s highlights the political background to independence, and difficulties which will be placed in the way by the Tory regime in Westminster (Politics is not on hold ... we must keep indy in sight, July 23). Some points need to be argued by the independentistas.
READ MORE: Scots saw through Boris long ago ... but he’s welcome here to remind us
The EU has a rule that all member states must have direct links to Europe for trade. Therefore when independent, if part of the EU, we could see the reinstatement of the direct ferry link(s) from Rosyth to Europe, and so Scottish exports could continue to Europe without passing through England.
While Tories harp on about the trading links Scotland has with England, this is a two-way relationship, and England cannot afford to cut trading ties with Scotland, so the prospect of a “hard border” with England is one for negotiation and would probably result in a similar one to the present Northern Irish border with UK, which “would never happen” but which miraculously appeared in the rush for Brexit.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Politics is not on hold – we must keep independence in sight
Whilst our SNP government continues to follow the legislative route and ask for a Section 30, the Tories are using this time to disrupt the march to independence. They have repeated ad nauseam that a Section 30 will never be granted, so we must present them with our own alternative, and sooner rather than later.
Let us start with publishing an outline constitution for an independent Scotland, a properly thought out currency which will be instituted on day one of independence, details of a national bank of last resort for that currency, and a clear statement that we will carry out a consultative referendum of our own if the Section 30 is refused, and see how they react!
Paul Gillon
Leven
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel