THE discussion about the Holyrood election and whether voting SNP in the list vote is wasted or whether voting for other pro-independence parties is gaming the system is difficult to argue either way.
If the SNP indicated clearly to the electorate that if there was a majority of votes for pro-independence parties
then they would declare independence, and if the other pro-independence parties clearly indicated the same, that would be democratic and ensure no pro-independence vote would be wasted.
While right now is not the time to indicate this vote for independence given the pandemic, if we don’t take the opportunity at the Holyrood election, as George Kerevan pointed out in his Monday column it is likely to be at least five years before a second referendum “during which window Boris will take every opportunity to erode and undermine the Yes majority” (Why a big indy vote next year will not get Scotland its referendum, July 20).
With repeated mandates we have become so used to asking permission of the UK for a Section 30 we have lost sight of the fact the vast majority of nations have declared independence without asking permission from the state which they are leaving. Indeed in 2010 at the International Court of Justice, discussing the Kosovo Declaration of Independence from Russia, the UK Government submission indicated it was to be expected that the law of the predecessor state would be broken in declaring independence but that in itself would not prevent international recognition, which is what legitimises the independence of a state.
Indeed it could be that if you think you need to get permission to be independent you actually don’t believe in self-determination or you don’t believe you have the right to it. When it comes to the Holyrood election the SNP needs to show clearly that doesn’t apply to them and to Scotland. Let’s go for it.
Jim Stamper
Bearsden
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel