I READ with some interest the Plan B notion that an SNP majority in Holyrood 2021 would automatically ensure that the UK Government would immediately open serious meaningful negotiations with the Scottish Government over the issue of Scotland being an independent EU nation.
I would suggest that Mr A Johnson PM wouldn’t even feel bound by a binding Section 30, nor would his sponsors, a pervasive situation that is likely to exist until the threat of the most racist and fascist-leaning Tory party members leaving to join another party recedes, and he feels secure in his reign.
International ridicule has followed Mr A Johnson PM for many years now, which is why Mr D Cummings takes the essential role of unofficial and unelected PM. In tandem the UK Parliament, having refused to move with the times, has now chosen to move back in time, and hibernate in the Palace of Westminster, inviting yet more international ridicule.
READ MORE: UK Government ready to allow import of US chlorine-washed chicken
The Scottish Parliament does indeed need to set out formally, and even more overtly, its aspirations for Scotland becoming an independent EU nation state, with as big a majority as possible to highlight its determination internationally. Crucially, the extent of divergence between Scotland and rUK needs to be seen to be somewhat greater than what some limited but additional devolution would allow for.
Seeing the excess death rate in Scotland being below that of the rUK during the Covid-19 pandemic is welcome, but far more is required. Mass testing of travel into Scotland is now clearly required on road, rail, and air, as a public health issue not a border issue. Similarly, sector testing can only go so far before we require mass local testing, if we are to honestly reassure local communities that local areas can reopen substantively.
Put simply, the people of Scotland and those watching internationally need to see the successful actions of a Scottish Parliament, and its Scottish Government, which is of the people and for the people, in stark contrast to the UK Parliament and its circus antics.
If it is felt that a public expression of independence is required then run an advisory referendum (just like the Brexit one) at the same time as the Holyrood 2021 vote, and use the Holyrood total votes cast as the baseline for the citizens’ desire for independence.
Stephen Tingle
Greater Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel