BORIS Johnson will respond “in due course” to Nicola Sturgeon’s letter requesting the transfer of power to Holyrood to hold a second independence referendum, Downing Street has said.
The First Minister wrote to the Prime Minister on December 19, seeking the authority for Scotland to hold a new vote that would be “beyond legal challenge”.
She also published a 38-page document entitled Scotland’s Right to Choose: Putting Scotland’s Future in Scotland’s Hands, setting out the Scottish Government’s case for the transfer of power from Westminster to Holyrood. She also sent a copy to Johnson.
Ahead of MPs gathering for the first time today following the Christmas recess, a spokeswoman for the Prime Minister told The National he would reply to the First Minister’s letter.
She said: “We received the letter and the Prime Minister will respond in due course.”
READ MORE: 2020 indy vote is ‘winnable’, senior SNP MP Pete Wishart says
She declined to say whether the Prime Minister had read the letter, nor did she give any time frame about when the response would be made.
Writing to Johnson a week after the General Election, Sturgeon noted she had spoken to him the day after polling day and had told him then that she would be making the Section 30 order request.
She also noted that during their conversation he had re-iterated the UK Government’s position – which is to oppose a second independence referendum – but that he would “engage seriously” with the Scottish Government’s proposals.
“When we spoke on Friday, you reiterated your government’s position on this issue – however, you also committed to engaging seriously with our proposals,” Sturgeon wrote in the
letter last month. “Indeed, I believe that on this – as on any issue – you have a duty to do so in a considered and reasonable manner.”
“I therefore look forward to discussing matters further with you in the new year.”
In a new twist, the Scottish Government called in the document for Holyrood to be given the permanent powers to hold referendums on independence from the UK.
The move was in contrast to the process ahead of the 2014 vote which transferred independence referendum powers to Holyrood but on only a temporary basis.
Unveiling the document, the First Minister described the SNP’s success in the General Election as an “unarguable mandate by any normal standard of democracy” for a second independence vote.
The document also set out draft amendments to the statute which would devolve the right to hold votes on leaving the UK to Holyrood.
It also argued that there has been a “material change of circumstance” since the 2014 independence referendum, based on “the prospect of Scotland leaving the EU against its will and what the EU exit has revealed about Scotland’s position within the UK”.
Launching the document at an event at her official residence of Bute House in Edinburgh, Sturgeon said she “fully expected to get a flat no” from Westminster initially.
“I’m going to stand my ground,” she added.
“I fully expect today we will get the flat no of Westminster opposition, but that will not be the end of the matter and Boris Johnson should not be under any illusion that it is.”
Johnson used the Queen’s Speech following the General Election to argue that in his view a second independence referendum in 2020 would be a “damaging distraction”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel