THE media is agog about need for the monarch to be “kept out” of the erupting crisis, should Boris Johnson refuse to stand down if he loses a vote of confidence. Why?
What then is the purpose of a head of state – presidential, monarchical or what – if they cannot pronounce in the ultimate constitutional crisis? Decorative trivia?
If the monarch cannot take that inherited role, then the monarch is no more than a celebrity, a show piece dressed up to be rolled out and shown off to provide pictures, tear-jerking stories and anecdotal clips of the latest offspring for the magazines.
It did not stop the monarchy years ago removing the PM of Australia, Gough Whitlam, through the then Governor General!
If the monarch is to be kept out, then the constitutional monarchy is redundant and totally unfit for purpose.
The role of taking the ultimate constitutional decision still needs to be performed. If the monarch needs to be “kept out”, then the monarchy should be abolished.
It looks like the Westminster system set up after the Glorious Revolution of 1688-89 has become as irrelevant as the present idiosyncratic Parliament with its precedents, quirks and archaic conventions.
The Union which evolved from this is in effect over.
When unelected advisors like Dominic Cummings dictate policy and convey that to the press, then we need to realign Scotland.
John Edgar
Kilmaurs
APPARENTLY (according to an unreliable source: the BBC), the Queen “wants to be kept out of the ‘looming constitutional crisis’ over Brexit”. The puir wee soul – imagine someone asking her to do a real day’s work at her age!
Alan Jardine
Kintore
GEORGE M Mitchell’s letter (Letters, August 11) is one of many attacks on veganism in response to its growth among the population and its support by environmentalists, as in the recent United Nations document that he refers to.
Unfortunately, support on environmental or health grounds (the latter constituting another common argument) leaves the animals, who are the most immediate victims of meat and dairy consumption, vulnerable to continued victimisation as long as means other than veganism can be found for addressing the environmental and health issues. And opponents of veganism are assiduous in suggesting such means.
There are vegan counter-arguments to these suggestions in their own, non-animal, terms, but that’s not the point. The right of sentient creatures to life and wellbeing should not hang on the coattails of other issues. Suppose cannibalism were being practised: would its opponents feel obliged to argue that it was bad for the environment or for the consumers’ health? Indeed, such arguments might be seen as trivialising and marginalising the moral issue.
There are personal, cultural and political reasons for the anti-vegan backlash. On the personal level, it’s understandable that people should react strongly to any threat to long-entrenched food habits which carry so much emotional weight. The cultural level is seen in Mitchell’s description of vegans as “devotees”, implying that veganism is a quasi-religious cult which normal, down-to-earth people have no time for.
And the political level is seen in the economics of animal farming, implied in Mitchell’s warning: “If the farms presently producing sheep and cattle were to go out of business that would seriously affect the population level and the other tax-paying members of our society”. Andy Wightman (in The Scotsman, July 30 2019) has noted in another context, there is a “close political relationship between the farming lobby and the Scottish Government”.
But the vegan response to this backlash should put the animals first. Our society is highly conscientious when it comes to nearly all moral issues except meat and dairy consumption. Racism and sexism are discredited in theory, if far from overcome in practice. Even “animal welfare” is supported, to the extent of buying free-range eggs and “humanely produced” meat. But suggest, as in my “cannibalism” analogy, the moral equivalence of humans and animals, and panic sets in, with a variety of sophistical arguments riding to the rescue: “Help! Animals aren’t persons; they can’t enter a social contract; they lack self-awareness; they don’t suffer the same way we do; we don’t need to give up meat!”
And so every day the animals are sent, in pain and terror, through the abattoir, and experience the anguish of having their children taken from them; and it’s all OK unless it can be shown to be bad for the environment or for human health. It’s long past time for our supposedly compassionate, progressive society to abandon this brutality and go vegan for the sake of the animals themselves.
Katherine Perlo
Forfar
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel