PRETTY much on a daily basis I find myself in awe of the improbity of those who represent the Conservative and Unionist Party.
This party has a scheme to dismantle, sell off and privatise the NHS. They will, of course, robustly deny they are doing any such thing, and will quickly quote Theresa May’s announcement that the NHS will be “£20 billion better off by 2023”. The point, though, is this figure demonstrates an ongoing underinvestment which has been Tory policy since they took power.
Just as the situation was with British Rail they will take each and every opportunity to highlight the shortcomings of a nationalised service they have run down, and point up the attractions of privatisation because, when they’re in power, it’s a revenue burden and they have to portray themselves as the champions of lower taxation.
Step up Edward Mountain. His duplicity comes straight from the “How to be a Tory” training manual. He, like Mary Scanlon before him, would portray himself as the defender of the oppressed and downtrodden who suffered at the hands of bullies in NHS Highland. He’ll never miss a chance to make as much noise as possible, with his castigations of the Scottish Government; even when his accusations have no credibility.
He challenged Jeane Freeman because she followed standard parliamentary procedure by releasing the Sturrock Report one hour before she made a statement; wicked Jeane didn’t let him have sight of it before then. He acknowledges that for her to have acquiesced would have been exceptional but, just like the orchestra rises, as the Caped Crusader takes to the skies, he generates as much noise as possible, to drown out the fact due process has been followed. You see, the bold Edward will look around for each and any opportunity to, with minimum effort, board any controversial bandwagon that might be harnessed to embarrass the Scottish Government.
Through 2017 and 2018 I was part of the “We All Need the Heartbeat” group which was campaigning to prevent the hijack of the Highland Heartbeat Centre located in Raigmore. We had meetings involving Fergus Ewing and David Stewart; where were you then, Edward? Too much work for a platform too small?
Please don’t be fooled. Edward’s on a crusade: just he doesn’t have the cape. His latest attempt at “Ka-pow!” is to criticise the Scottish Government for not drawing up “contingency plans” because of the industrial unrest at Highlands and Islands Airports Ltd. He says he’s “deeply concerned (no; he isn’t) by the impact on businesses, families and patients who are reliant on air travel”. And he’s “disappointed (no; he isn’t) that the Scottish Government is not directly involved with the contingency plans”, concluding with “I think people in the Highlands would expect a lot more than the ‘hands off’ approach the Scottish Government seem to be taking on this very serious matter.” OK, Edward, what would you have them do? Mobilise the RAF? I don’t think they can manage that one because defence is not a devolved matter!
Make no mistake about it. The Tories have a policy, written in stone, to dismantle any and all public services. This they will hotly deny but they will continue, overtly or covertly, to do it while making sure they never miss a chance to denigrate any other party. Their loyalty runs “party and class before country or constituent” and Edward is up there with the best!
Ned Larkin
Inverness
JEFF Fallow (Letters, May 17) misunderstood my message. I wrote in my letter “Is everyone in Scotland ready to take the responsibility of governing themselves?”
Are we certain that we are not going to witness what happened in 1707, when the final ratification vote decided about a mutual parliament for Scotland and England (about which Mr Kenneth S Macrae wrote wisely in his letter on May 16)? We must remember that no political party has a majority in the Scottish Parliament.
Everybody has got their own opinion. The coming election will show which party has the biggest support in Scotland, then we will be able to say which way Scotland will go.
I want to repeat my sentence – “my heart belongs to my new homeland – Scotland” – and I wish my new homeland all the best.
Roland Manowski
Aboyne, Aberdeenshire
IN your guide to Arbroath in the Sunday National (May 19) it is suggested the Stone of Destiny was “stolen” from Westminster Abbey in 1950 and deposited at Arbroath Abbey. Surprised The National should make such a basic historical gaffe! The Stone was in fact “stolen” by Edward Longshanks, Edward I of England, in 1296 and repatriated by four nationalist Scottish students. Although the perpetrators were, eventually, known to the authorities, such was the public approval of the deed that no further action was taken.
Ken MacColl
Oban
SPOTTED outside Glasgow Central Station at 1pm yesterday: a coach with the logo and (London) address of Change UK. I spotted one individual with a T-shirt displaying a giant Union Jack. I wondered if this metropolitan party realises the significance in Glasgow of that flag!
Why was the bus here? Who is paying for it? Does Change.uk have any grassroots organisation in Scotland?
Hamish Kirk
Rothesay
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel