THE Scottish Government intends to bring forward new legislation to ensure Scots law continues to align with EU rules post-Brexit after it abandoned its Continuity Bill.
Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell has said he wants to develop legislation to make sure there is “no regression in standards or protections” in areas including environmental protection and human rights.
It comes almost four months after the UK Supreme Court ruled the Scottish Government’s Continuity Bill could not be legally introduced.
READ MORE: Brexit: Michael Russell urges UK Government to commit to EU election
The previous legislation was brought forward amid fears the UK Government’s European Withdrawal Act would be a “power grab”, with responsibilities the Scottish Government believe should come to Holyrood instead going to Westminster after Brexit.
In December, Supreme Court president Lady Hale ruled the Continuity Bill was within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament in all but one area when it was passed because it did not relate to reserved matters.
But the Bill, which received the backing of the Scottish Parliament, was superseded when the UK Government passed its EU Withdrawal Bill.
In a letter to the Scottish Parliament’s Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh, Russell wrote: “The extent to which devolved law aligns itself with the law of the EU should be a decision for the Scottish Parliament to take, not the UK Government. This Government is committed to no regression in standards or protections should EU exit take place, and the replacement of regulatory powers lost in consequence of EU exit will be essential to ensure that.”
On the Supreme Court’s decision to rule the Bill was unlawful, Russell warned it had “profound implications on devolution”.
“The court held that when the Scottish Parliament passed the Continuity Bill it had the power to decide what should be done, in devolved Scots law, to protect our system of laws from the damaging consequences of EU exit,” he wrote.
WATCH: Michael Russell says David Mundell's role has 'no function at all'
Scottish Greens parliamentary co-leader Patrick Harvie said: “The Scottish Parliament has been shown contempt by the UK Government and the people of Scotland should not be expected to roll over and accept this. If Brexit ultimately goes ahead, the UK’s determination to overrule our stronger approach to environmental governance must not be accepted.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel