THE headline in Monday’s London’s Evening Standard ran: ‘Anti-Westminster’.
Alex Salmond has spoken 104 times in Commons since the General Election. It was, by all accounts, a slightly odd angle for the newspaper to take. Look at this politician, the article sneered, doing what his constituents have voted for him to do.
If the Gordon MP was supposed to have been embarrassed by the Standard’s story, it didn’t really work. By last night, Salmond had spoken in the chamber 124 times. The interventions and speeches mean that the former first minister is now the third most active MP in terms of contributions, just behind the Prime Minister and the leader of the House of Commons, Chris Grayling. Trailing behind Salmond in fourth and fifth places respectively are Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond and Chancellor George Osborne.
As of yesterday morning, other SNP MPs featured highly on the list, with Angus Brendan MacNeil, MP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar in ninth place with 71 contributions, SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson 17th with 57 and Stephen Gethins in 35th with 39 contributions, despite making his maiden speech less than one month ago. Scottish Labour’s Ian Murray was 22nd with 49, and LibDem Alistair Carmichael is at 100th with 20.
Salmond said the SNP’s zeal would remain undimmed: “We have just won an astounding victory of 56 out of 59 MPs elected on a platform of making Scotland’s voice heard at Westminster.
“The Scottish lion – myself and my colleagues – will be roaring throughout this Parliament and those of a nervous disposition from the Labour and Tory benches will have to get used to it. We have a lot to say, but the real story here is why London MPs are saying so little as opposed to why Scottish MPs are contributing so much.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here