Former First Minister Alex Salmond urged Labour to “find a backbone” and to “become an effective opposition” after they abstained on a vote that could have seen the Tory Government suffer its first defeat of the new parliament.
Parliament was voting was on an amendment to the EU referendum bill that would have introduced a period of purdah.
Purdah is normal practice before elections and referendums. It means that governments are not able to introduce any new policies or initiatives in the four weeks leading up to a vote. It was imposed before the referendum on Scottish independence last year, although Westminster parties were accused of breaking it while campaigning as part of the Better Together campaign.
David Cameron had wanted to avoid purdah before the European referendum, claiming it would interfere with the working of government. This move sparked a backbench revolt among Tory MPs. The SNP argued that it would have no effect on an “impartial” government.
Cameron had earlier avoided a defeat over suggestions that the European referendum be held on the May 5, the same day as Holyrood and local government elections. When it became obvious that his party would not back his preferred timing of the referendum, Cameron changed plans before they went to the vote.
Despite attempts to persuade his backbench rebels to hold off, the purdah proposal was taken to the vote. Cameron won by 288 votes to 97. Had Labour voted with the SNP it would have seen him defeated. Instead they abstained.
Salmond, who is the SNP’s foreign affairs spokesperson, said: “It is almost unbelievable. It was a penalty kick with an open goal ... and Labour did not even kick the ball.
‘‘Labour have yet again chosen to abstain on a key vote – they need to find a backbone and become an effective opposition in parliament.
“The UK Government has already caved on its proposal to have the EU referendum on the same day as the Scottish and other elections – but now because of Labour, we’ve missed the opportunity to defeat the government on purdah restrictions. It was clear that the Tories were angling to hijack Scottish elections with the EU referendum and the united opposition had blown them off course.
“The SNP will continue to campaign for Scotland’s role in the EU – but if we are to have an EU referendum we will help ensure it’s done to the gold standard of the Scottish referendum.”
Speaking in the Commons, Europe minister David Liddington said: “It is vital that the British public and both sides in the referendum debate accept the referendum is being conducted fairly and that therefore everybody will feel they are able to accept the result”.
Liddington added: “It is not our intention that the Government should be a lead campaigner in the referendum and it is right the House should seek reassurance from us on this point.”
Salmond pointed to the referendum on Scottish independence: “Let’s take a scenario, the possibility, that at some point in the course of the referendum campaign next year or the year after that, the No side moves to the front of that referendum.
“In order to try and get the result Prime Minister Cameron would wish of that time, that he wants a Yes result, he needs a last-minute initiative.
‘‘And with no rules or restrictions saying new political initiatives should not be made at a government level in the last 28 days of the campaign, what would be to stop such a prime minister at that time doing a tour of European capitals... suspending question time in the national parliaments and flying as one here to London to announce a new commitment, a new undertaking, a new pledge – a new vow?”
At least 27 Conservative MPs are thought to have voted against the Government. If they were joined by all opposition MPs, there would have been enough to defeat David Cameron’s Government, which currently has a working majority of 16.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here