WHY are most of the media so blind to what is perhaps the largest material danger to the world from the grinding war in Ukraine – the threat of nuclear catastrophe – even though it has been signalled publicly from the top rank of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)?

At the end of last month, its secretary-general, Rafael Grossi, briefed the Security Council of the United Nations on the parlous condition of the Zaporizhzhia NPP nuclear power station, which sits in the middle of the bitterly contested war zone. This is Europe’s largest and now, according to Grossi, probably the world’s most poorly maintained civil nuclear facility.

Immediately after the briefing Grossi held a press conference.

He talked about the massive reduction in the number of back-up power lines, without which a nuclear meltdown is a prospect. He described the shortages of easily accessible coolant water, made worse by the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam.

READ MORE: This is why the EU’s new defence plans matter to Scotland

Grossi is a career diplomat and careful in his use of their words. When, during a press conference, he explains that the plant is “on the front line”, that on a bad day the prospect of a drone attack is worrying, and says we are “walking on thin ice”, the issues are serious, pressing and dangerous.

I wrote a paper, Castle Zaporizhzhia, last year for Scottish CND detailing the many disastrous implications of having a nuclear power plant in the middle of a war zone. I outlined why it is impossible to fight what is normally described a non-nuclear conventional war with a nuclear power station in the battlefield.

Zaporizhzhia NPP is more than an unwelcome inconvenience for the political leaders who ultimately call the shots in this war. It is also a huge challenge to proponents of civilian nuclear power, particularly those who promote small nuclear reactors as a clean energy source in the face of a climate emergency.

The National: Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant loses external power

The consequences of a nuclear breakdown would spill well beyond the war in Ukraine to every country that has built, intends to build, or hopes to build a nuclear power station as a low-carbon producer of energy in an increasingly geopolitically unstable world.

The military have been pondering these issues for a very long time, even occasionally in public. But the media, governments and corporations have been studiously ignoring them. Why? It is clear from the report underpinning Grossi’s briefing to the UN Security Council that Russia is involved in a game of nuclear chicken – raw leverage for future invaders of countries with nuclear power stations.

It took the IAEA six months after Zaporizhzhia’s capture to get the Russians to agree to the establishment of a permanent rotating team of IAEA inspectors. Today all nuclear power plants in Ukraine have IAEA inspectors on site. Indeed, the Zaporizhzhia team are on their 16th rotation.

READ MORE: Ukrainians have their backs to the wall amid two-year anniversary

IAEA teams report a worrying pattern of gradual decline in the maintenance and upkeep of this plant, with the Russian authorities appearing to play of cat and mouse, as I predicted last year. At the tactical and operational level, only a military dimwit would give up the opportunity to keep the enemy guessing.

On the Russian side the information war is well locked in, despite what some of our more excitable newspapers declare. Putin’s hold has been made even more secure by the cack-handed sanctions strategy of the West, based upon a neoliberal economic hubris which simply cannot countenance considering the lived reality of ordinary people.

From 1941 until the 1960s, the American working class was built on a war economy undisturbed by enemy bombing or invasion. Keynesianism, in other words. Putin has now cornered himself into a situation where he has no option but to re-arm in order to get an economic popularity boost as FDR did, and for similar reasons.

But the IAEA report highlights an existing, live, and increasingly dangerous nuclear dimension to the war in Ukraine. That could further undermine European public resolve, over and above the terrifying possibility of miscalculation from the presence of so-called tactical nuclear weapons. It is time we woke up to the global threat embedded in this conflict, and acted accordingly.

Bill Ramsay is on the national executive of Scottish CND and is secretary of SNP CND. He is author of Castle Zaporizhzhia