A key British industry is being forced to “send pounds to Putin” rather than support the domestic coal market, ministers have been warned.
Conservative MPs pressed the Government to use UK coal to support the country’s steel industry instead of relying on imports from Russia and elsewhere.
Richard Holden, Tory MP for North West Durham, also detailed how the UK imports between five and 10 million tonnes of coal a year – adding this represents more than £1 billion of net imports annually.
He warned this money is not going into UK jobs as part of the transition to new methods of fuelling industry, and highlighted how steelmaking in south Wales is using coal from around the world.
Coal has played an increasingly small role in Britain’s power mix in recent years, with a Government target to phase it out altogether by 2024, and saw its share of generation fall to just 2% in 2019.
Leading a Commons debate, Mr Holden said: “Of our net imports, approximately 40% of our coal comes from Russia and 20% Colombia.
“The blast furnaces at Port Talbot could have been burning with British coal, but now they’re going to be burning with Russian coal.
“We are literally forcing one of our key strategic industries to send pounds to (Vladimir) Putin rather than supporting good jobs as we bridge to future technology that will see our strategic heavy industry decarbonise further.”
Mr Holden said the argument against domestic coal production “collapses entirely” when environmental factors are considered, as he questioned the standards adhered to in Russia, Colombia or the United States compared to the UK.
He added: “That’s before we get to the staggering quantities of CO2 emissions of shipping a bulk product halfway around the world.”
Mark Jenkinson, Conservative MP for Workington, issued a plea to ministers to “not let the perfect be the enemy of the good” to reach the target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
He said: “We cannot pat ourselves on the back for a job well done in 2050 if we’ve got there on the back of steel or its components parts, like coal, imported from halfway around the world.”
He added: “I urge the minister to ensure it’s UK coal used to make UK steel used to help Britain build back better.”
Former miner Lee Anderson, now Conservative MP for Ashfield, said most of the 7.9 million tonnes of coal consumed by the UK in 2019 was imported.
He said: “This cannot be right.
“If we’re using coal in this country to make steel then we should be mining the coal in this country and not importing from the US, Russia, Australia.”
Mr Anderson added there needs to be a recognition that a “significant demand” for coal remains in the UK for the steel industry, making cement, heritage railways and domestic heating – and efforts must be made to mine it here.
Labour MP Mary Kelly Foy (City of Durham) said speaking about a future without coal does not “denigrate the past”.
She added: “None of this is ever said to denigrate the past that I have spoken about, when coal seemed a beautiful thing and didn’t just power cities, towns and villages, it fuelled our communities and gave energy to our movement.
“However in 2020, we know that the future is not in the black gold, it’s in the new green technologies that will protect our plane for centuries to come.”
Replying for the Government, Business minister Kwasi Kwarteng said: “I think that coal in industry is something that will not disappear immediately, but we have to look at new ways of decarbonising that industry and that’s precisely why we’re looking at hydrogen and also carbon capture to drive that decarbonisation process.
“The net zero target, which has shaped all our energy policy in the last year, is absolutely vital for us to meet our target and also to meet our aspirations for the kind of community, the kind of economy we want to see.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel