More than two-thirds of patients hospitalised due to coronavirus continue to suffer from debilitating symptoms more than seven weeks after being discharged, a new study suggests.
Researchers found that 54 days after discharge, 69% of patients were still experiencing fatigue, and 53% were suffering from persistent breathlessness.
They also found that 34% still had a cough and 15% reported depression.
In addition 38% of chest radiographs (X-rays) remained abnormal and 9% were getting worse, according to the study carried out in collaboration with clinicians at the Royal Free London (RFL) and University College London Hospitals NHS Trust (UCLH).
Dr Swapna Mandal, an honorary clinical associate professor at UCL division of medicine, said the data shows so-called “long Covid” is a real phenomenon and that further research is needed to understand how the symptoms of Covid-19 can be treated in the long-term.
She said: “Patients whose Covid-19 illness is serious enough for them to require hospital care often continue to suffer significant symptoms for many weeks after their discharge.”
Professor John Hurst at UCL division of medicine, said: “Understanding ‘long Covid’ is critical in helping people who have been through this life-changing experience return to health, while rapid roll-out of this follow-up service shows how our clinical teams worked together to deliver an innovative service during a period of unprecedented demand on our staff.”
In the study published in the medical journal Thorax, clinical teams set up a post-Covid follow up clinic to review both the psychological and physiological symptoms of discharged patients.
In total, they observed 384 patients who had tested positive and had been treated at Barnet Hospital, the Royal Free Hospital or UCLH.
Collectively the average length of stay in hospital was 6.5 days.
All of the patients were called or seen in person by a member of the clinical team on average 54 days after they had left hospital.
Some further face-to-face clinical appointments were required for patients needing rehabilitation and/or further investigation.
The research suggests that for those patients whose chest X-ray was still showing signs of infection when they were discharged, 62% had a normal x-ray when it was repeated.
While the remainder (38%) were still showing changes.
Almost one in ten (9%) of these patients had an X-ray which was worse than when they were discharged, researchers found.
The scientists note a number of limitations to their study including that the study only included patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, and that patients requiring prolonged ICU and in-patient stay may be under-represented in the analysis.
They add that not all participants were willing to take part in the review or attend for investigations which potentially introduced selection bias.
The researchers cannot determine if these features are unique to Covid-19. They may simply be similar to those following admission for other critical respiratory illnesses.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here