Endurance swimmer Lewis Pugh has called for the UK to “set the example” on ocean protection by properly conserving the seas in its care.
In a blog to mark the second anniversary of the UK’s call to protect 30% of the oceans by 2030, Mr Pugh – who campaigned for the move in a swim the length of the English Channel – said consistent efforts were needed to achieve the goal.
The UK Government made the call at the UN General Assembly two years ago, and a year later formed the Global Ocean Alliance inviting other nations to support the 30% by 2030 goal, with more than 20 countries now signed on.
But Mr Pugh, who has also swum in places such as Antarctica, the Arctic, and the seas of South Georgia to raise awareness of the need to protect the oceans, said he often saw governments setting targets but not following up “with the funding or the hard graft needed to reach them”.
He compared protecting the oceans to training for his swim up the Channel, which required consistent efforts, and said governments could learn from athletes on that front.
Mr Pugh urged the Government to enact the Benyon review of marine protection in UK waters it commissioned, by creating highly protected marine areas in home waters, where all damaging human activities are banned.
And there should be an increase in “full and proper protection” in overseas territories such as Ascension Island, St Helena, Tristan da Cunha and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, he urged.
Mr Pugh, UN patron of the oceans, said: “The world is reeling from the effects of Covid-19, and we are in the midst of Brexit.
“We don’t know what other storms are on the horizon. But we can’t let these crises distract us.
“The UK has to keep its eye on the 30% target, and work consistently every day to get there. Our oceans depend on it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here