Twitter has said it is looking into claims the social network’s photo preview algorithm could be racially biased after users posted a series of examples over the weekend.
The tech giant uses a system called neural network to automatically crop photo previews before you can click on them to view the full image.
This focuses on the area identified as the “salient” image region, where it is likely a person would look when freely viewing an entire photo.
But tests by a number of people on the platform suggest that the technology may treat white faces as the focal point more frequently than black faces.
One example posted online shows American politician Mitch McConnell and Barack Obama, with the system favouring Mr McConnell in its preview over the former US president.
Meanwhile, another person tried with Simpson cartoon characters Lenny and Carl – the latter who is black – with Lenny appearing to take preference.
A third user even tried with dogs, resulting in a white dog in the prime preview position over a black dog.
Twitter chief design officer Dantley Davis tweeted that the firm is investigating, saying that there are “some variables that we need to look into”.
Mr Davis posted an image of a black man and a white man in a rough test of his own, in which the black man was favoured in this case but only once both men’s hands had been cropped out of view.
“It’s not a scientific test as it’s an isolated example, but it points to some variables that we need to look into,” he said.
“Both men now have the same suits and I covered their hands. We’re still investigating the NN.”
Chief technology officer Parag Agrawal also tweeted about the matter, saying that developers did analyse the model before rolling it out but said it “needs continuous improvement” and that he is “eager to learn from this”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here